MOT Status
ValidMileage
151,276 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Front Coil spring fractured or broken (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive engine area (8.4.1 (a) (i))
engine malfunction massage on due to oil condition fault
Front Position lamp not working both (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Headlamp not working on dipped beam (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Oil leak, but not excessive engine area (8.4.1 (a) (i))
engine malfunction massage on due to oil condition fault
Brake disc worn, but not excessively All four brake discs are worn and corroded (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Central Rear Exhaust mounting defective Mid rear bracket has fractured and is no longer supporting the exhaust (6.1.2 (a))
Nearside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Nearside Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge All four tyres are low on tread, all four are cracking on the surface and within the tread. (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Rear Registration plate lamp does not illuminate simultaneously with the position lamps (4.7.2 (a))
Brake disc worn, but not excessively All four brake discs are worn and corroded (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Central Rear Exhaust mounting defective Mid rear bracket has fractured and is no longer supporting the exhaust (6.1.2 (a))
Nearside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Nearside Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge All four tyres are low on tread, all four are cracking on the surface and within the tread. (5.2.3 (e))
Central Exhaust mounting defective Rear centre mount snapped, front centre mount almost corroded through, (6.1.2 (a))
Nearside Front Lower Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view Stone chip (3.2 (a) (i))
Offside Front Supplementary restraint system warning lamp indicates a fault (7.1.6 (a))
Central Exhaust mounting defective Rear centre mount snapped, front centre mount almost corroded through, (6.1.2 (a))
Nearside Front Lower Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view Stone chip (3.2 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Lower Coil spring fractured or broken (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre has ply or cords exposed (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Nearside Rear Outer Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (1.1.13 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Nearside Front Steering rack gaiter missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (2.1.3 (g) (ii))
Covering above & below vehicle hinders view to some testable items
Front brake discs are badly worn & lipped (see inner faces)
O/s rear tyre has a cut on inner-band (marked)
rear brake discs corroded & also lipped
Rear Valve stem seriously damaged (both) (4.1.D.1e)
Covering above & below vehicle hinders view to some testable items
Front brake discs are badly worn & lipped (see inner faces)
O/s rear tyre has a cut on inner-band (marked)
rear brake discs corroded & also lipped
Child seat fitted not allowing full inspection of adult belt
How Reliable is the Ford Kuga?
Based on 2,487,727 MOT tests across 269,939 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
ND11 JZK is a 2011 Ford Kuga in Black with a 1,997cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 19 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 63.2%.
Across all 2011 Ford Kuga models, the average MOT pass rate is 76.4% with a typical mileage of 75,414 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Ford Kuga fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 11,708 recorded failures. If you're considering buying ND11 JZK, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Kuga typically stays on UK roads for around 18 years. At 15 years old, this Ford Kuga is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of ND11 JZK?
You can check the full history of ND11 JZK by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was ND11 JZK registered?
ND11 JZK is a 2011 Ford Kuga, first registered on 10 June 2011.
Is ND11 JZK safe to buy?
The MOT history for ND11 JZK shows 19 tests with a 63.2% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does ND11 JZK have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on ND11 JZK. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.