MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
82,139 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Lower Coil spring corroded bothside (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front tyre worn on inner edge
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened bothside (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Front Headlamp lens seriously defective bothside (4.1.1 (b) (ii))
Front Lower Coil spring corroded bothside (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front tyre worn on inner edge
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened bothside (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Rear brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened bothside (3.5.1i)
Rear registration plate delaminated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Front Headlamp aim beam image obviously incorrect bothside (1.8.A.1b)
Front Headlamp has a product on the lens so that the light output is severely reduced bothside (1.7.5a)
Offside Front Lower Shock absorber has a serious fluid leak (2.7.3)
Rear Registration plate lamp not working bothside (1.1.C.1d)
Rear brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened bothside (3.5.1i)
Rear registration plate delaminated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Front Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output bothside (1.7.5a)
Front Lower Shock absorber has slight corrosion to the casing bothside (2.7.2a)
Front registration plate delaminated but not likely to be misread and rear (6.3.1d)
Rear brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened bothside (3.5.1i)
rear axle corroded
undertray fitted obstructing some under engine components
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm synthetic bush deteriorated resulting in excessive movement rear bush (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm synthetic bush deteriorated resulting in excessive movement rear bush (2.4.G.2)
Front Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output bothside (1.7.5a)
Front Lower Shock absorber has slight corrosion to the casing bothside (2.7.2a)
Front registration plate delaminated but not likely to be misread and rear (6.3.1d)
Rear brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened bothside (3.5.1i)
rear axle corroded
undertray fitted obstructing some under engine components
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover excessively damaged so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front Headlamp has a product on the lens so that the light output is severely reduced (1.7.5a)
Offside Front Headlamp has a product on the lens so that the light output is severely reduced (1.7.5a)
Offside Rear Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Nearside Rear Shock absorber has a serious fluid leak (2.7.3)
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
centre exhaust heat shield slightly insecure
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Brakes imbalanced across an axle (3.7.B.5b)
Offside Front brake disc has restricted free movement (3.5.1j)
How Reliable is the Ford Focus C-max?
Based on 1,326,487 MOT tests across 79,932 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
ND53 HZL is a 2003 Ford Focus C-max in Silver with a 1,798cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 19 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 68.4%.
Across all 2003 Ford Focus C-max models, the average MOT pass rate is 72.0% with a typical mileage of 74,678 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Ford Focus C-max fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 67,238 recorded failures. If you're considering buying ND53 HZL, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Focus C-max typically stays on UK roads for around 23 years. At 23 years old, this Ford Focus C-max is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of ND53 HZL?
You can check the full history of ND53 HZL by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was ND53 HZL registered?
ND53 HZL is a 2003 Ford Focus C-max, first registered on 30 September 2003.
Is ND53 HZL safe to buy?
The MOT history for ND53 HZL shows 19 tests with a 68.4% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does ND53 HZL have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on ND53 HZL. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.