MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
63,871 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
All brake ferrules have protection applied
Complete underside has underseal applied masking testable items and structures
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting repair covered in underseal Leaf spring hanger (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting repair covered in underseal Leaf spring hanger (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (4.7.1 (b) (i))
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Chassis corroded (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule All Brake hose ferrules (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Central Front Power steering pipe/hose slightly corroded At steering rack (2.1.5 (g) (i))
Nearside Front Macpherson strut corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened Upper/Lower arm (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Leaf spring anchor bracket damaged but not seriously weakened both (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive At leaf spring (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Upper Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material All brake pipes at/going into valve block corroded (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Front Macpherson strut corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened Upper/Lower arm (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Leaf spring anchor bracket corroded but not seriously weakened Both (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive At leaf spring (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Rear Vehicle structure slightly corroded within 30cm of towbar mounting os/ns (6.1.6 (i) (i))
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Chassis corroded (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Emissions unable to be completed Due to EML mil on (8.2.2.2 (e))
Engine MIL inoperative or indicates a malfunction (8.2.1.2 (h))
Front Brake performance unable to be tested Due to brake disc condition (1.2.1 (g))
Nearside Front Brake disc significantly and obviously worn (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Offside Front Brake disc significantly and obviously worn (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Offside Front Wheel bearing rough when rotated (5.1.3 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Shock absorbers has a serious fluid leak (5.3.2 (b))
Rear Registration plate lamp does not illuminate simultaneously with the position lamps (4.7.2 (a))
Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule All brake hose flexi ferrules corroded (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Central Front Power steering pipe/hose slightly corroded At steering rack (2.1.5 (g) (i))
Nearside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material Corroded at calliper (1.1.11 (c))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Upper Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material All brake pipes at valve block corroded (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material Corroded at calliper (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive At both os/ns rear leaf springs mountings (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened at inner faces (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Wheel bearing slightly noisy (5.1.3 (b) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive at engine (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened both front lower (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive chassis at both rear spring mounting areas (5.3.6 (a) (i))
heavy corrosion at both rear leaf springs
heavy corrosion over parts of chassis
Nearside Front Coil spring fractured or broken (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (3.4 (b) (ii))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Offside Rear Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
heavy corrosion over whole chassis
Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material front and rear (1.1.11 (c))
PARK BRAKE LEVER HAS LITTLE RESERVE TRAVEL
Rear Service brake requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair PARK BRAKE (1.2.1 (c))
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced over front and rear suspension arms ,springs and components (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced over various chassis sections and members (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (3.5 (a))
Nearside Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Coil spring fractured or broken (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front coil spring broken (2.4.C.1a)
Nearside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Offside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
How Reliable is the Toyota Hilux?
Based on 1,500,658 MOT tests across 146,528 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
NES 153 is a 2012 Toyota Hilux in Black with a 2,982cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 15 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 66.7%.
Across all 2012 Toyota Hilux models, the average MOT pass rate is 75.9% with a typical mileage of 77,987 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Toyota Hilux fails its MOT is fog lamp not working, accounting for 30,380 recorded failures. If you're considering buying NES 153, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Toyota Hilux typically stays on UK roads for around 39 years. At 14 years old, this Toyota Hilux is still in the earlier part of its expected life.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of NES 153?
You can check the full history of NES 153 by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was NES 153 registered?
NES 153 is a 2012 Toyota Hilux, first registered on 7 September 2012.
Is NES 153 safe to buy?
The MOT history for NES 153 shows 15 tests with a 66.7% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does NES 153 have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on NES 153. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.