MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
16,453 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (1.1.13 (a))
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Front Steering headbearing has excessive wear or free play (2.2.2 (f) (i))
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (1.1.13 (a))
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (5.2.3 (e))
All direction indicators not working (4.4.1 (a) (ii))
Brake component insecure Rear caliper carrier. (1.1.21 (c))
Brake performance not tested Front caliper insecure. (1.2.1 (g))
Exhaust noise is clearly in excess of that emitted by a similar motorcycle fitted with a standard silencer in average condition (8.1.1 (a))
Front Brake caliper insecure (1.1.16 (c) (i))
Front Brake component modification unsafe Front pads not adequately bearing on disc surface. (1.1.21 (d) (i))
Nearside Headlamp aim too low (4.1.2 (a))
Offside Headlamp aim too high (4.1.2 (a))
Offside Headlamp lens seriously defective Dipping to right. (4.1.1 (b) (ii))
Offside Headlamp lens seriously defective Dipping to right. (4.1.1 (b) (ii))
Front Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Front Valve stem seriously damaged (5.2.3 (j)) DANGEROUS
Rear Valve stem seriously damaged (5.2.3 (j)) DANGEROUS
Front brake lever end broken. still adequate for use,
Nearside rear wheel adjuster plate contacting sprocket carrier,
Rear Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (1.1.13 (a))
Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Steering headbearing has slight free play (2.2.2 (f) (i))
Front Motorcycle structure joining/attachment plate or fastening insecure headlight bracket (6.1.1 (b) (i))
Front Steering operation fouling on the fuel tank or bodywork on full lock (2.1.4 (b))
Rear Brake effort inadequate at a wheel (1.2.1 (a) (i))
Rear Brake indicates excessive fluctuation of brake effort (1.2.1 (e))
Rear Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of a single lamp or all lamps (4.7.1 (b) (ii))
Roller brake test The less effective brake control does not achieve an efficiency of 25% (1.2.2 (a) (i))
Front Brake indicates a slightly grabbing brake (1.2.1 (c))
Front Headlamp light intensity reduced (4.1.4 (a))
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Rear Suspension arm pin, bush or joint worn but not resulting in excessive movement arm (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Front mudguard insecure (2.3.7)
Front Steering headbearing has excessive free play (2.2.2)
Fuel system component insecure (7.2.1b)
Headlamp aim not tested (1.6)
Headlamp insecure (1.2.3b)
Nearside Front Brake pipe inadequately supported (3.2.B2b)
Rear Plate brake test indicates a binding brake (3.3.B1a)
Rear Rear position lamp does not illuminate immediately when it is switched on (1.1.3a)
Registration plate deteriorated (6.3.1d)
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Brake lever is short but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Steering headbearing has slight free play (2.2.2)
Drive chain excessively loose (6.2.1d)
Nearside Front shock absorber seal failed and leaking oil (2.3.3)
Rear Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (4.1.3(ii))
Brake lever is short but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Steering headbearing has slight free play (2.2.2)
Offside Front shock absorber has light misting of stanchion (2.3.3)
Drive chain worn but not considered excessive (6.2.1e)
Exhaust slightly deteriorated (7.1.1a)
Front Roller brake test indicates a slightly juddering brake (3.3.A1b)
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Front suspension has slight stiffness in the movement of the suspension. (2.3.6b)
Offside Front Brake lever is short but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Rear Drive chain sprocket slightly worn (6.2.1e)
Rear Roller brake test indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (3.3.A1d)
Rear suspension component slightly corroded. (2.4.A.1a)
Indicator switch insecure (1.5.4)
Stop lamp does not illuminate immediately a brake applies (1.3.1a)
Rear Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.2.A1f(i)) DANGEROUS
Rear shock absorber has a slightly reduced damping effect (2.4.A.3b)
Exhaust is leaking and excessively noisey (7.1.1b)
Headlamp aim too low (1.6)
Rear shock absorber has a slightly reduced damping effect (2.4.A.3b)
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Front Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (4.1.3(ii))
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Rear Brake disc(s) slightly scored (3.2.A1l)
Nearside Rear Direction indicators flashing more than 120 times per minute (1.5.1c)
Rear Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (4.1.3(ii))
Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.2.A1f(i)) DANGEROUS
Front Floor brake test indicates a severely grabbing brake (3.3.C2d) DANGEROUS
Rear Brake disc(s) slightly scored (3.2.A1l)
Front Floor brake test indicates a binding brake (3.3.C2c) DANGEROUS
How Reliable is the Hyosung GT 125 Comet?
Based on 2,051 MOT tests across 310 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
NK53 LKG is a 2003 Hyosung GT 125 Comet in White with a 124cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 22 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 54.5%.
Across all 2003 Hyosung GT 125 Comet models, the average MOT pass rate is 67.6% with a typical mileage of 15,604 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Hyosung GT 125 Comet fails its MOT is stop lamp does not illuminate immediately a brake applies, accounting for 86 recorded failures. If you're considering buying NK53 LKG, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Hyosung GT 125 Comet typically stays on UK roads for around 23 years. At 23 years old, this Hyosung GT 125 Comet is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of NK53 LKG?
You can check the full history of NK53 LKG by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was NK53 LKG registered?
NK53 LKG is a 2003 Hyosung GT 125 Comet, first registered on 19 September 2003.
Is NK53 LKG safe to buy?
The MOT history for NK53 LKG shows 22 tests with a 54.5% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does NK53 LKG have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on NK53 LKG. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.