MOT Status
ValidMileage
248,810 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Inner Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Offside Front Inner Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Nearside Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Steering rack has excessive free play detected at the steering wheel to the extent that safe steering is affected (steering rack fitted) (2.3 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Offside Play in steering rack inner joint(s) ()
Nearside Play in steering rack inner joint(s) ()
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Central Prop shaft joint excessively worn (6.1.7 (c) (i))
Nearside Rear Parking brake inoperative on one side (1.4.1 (a))
Nearside Rear Upper Shock absorbers has an excessively worn bush (5.3.2 (c))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Parking brake efficiency below requirements (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint likely to become detached (5.3.4 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Upper Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush (5.3.2 (c))
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Front Prop shaft flexible coupling slightly deteriorated (6.1.7 (d) (i))
Nearside Rear SEAT HEADREST MISSING
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear SEAT HEADREST MISSING
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Rear REAR DIFFERENTIAL INPUT SHAFT SEAL LEAKING
Nearside Front Service brake excessively binding (1.2.1 (f))
Nearside Front Steering rack has excessive free play detected at the steering wheel (steering rack fitted) (2.3 (a) (i))
FRONT PADS WEARING UNEVENLY
Front Prop shaft flexible coupling slightly deteriorated (6.1.7 (d) (i))
Nearside Front Outer Brake pad(s) wearing thin WORN TO 3MM (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Nearside Rear SEAT HEADREST MISSING
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Direction indicator incorrect colour (4.4.3 (a))
Offside Rear SEAT HEADREST MISSING
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Rear REAR DIFFERENTIAL INPUT SHAFT SEAL LEAKING
Offside Rear HEADREST MISSING FROM THE SEAT
Oil leak, but not excessive REAR DIFFERENTIAL FRONT SEAL LEAKING (8.4.1 (a) (i))
SAT NAV FITTED TO WINDSCREEN
Exhaust system insecure CENTER CLAMP MISSING (6.1.2 (a))
Nearside Front Headlamp not working on dipped beam (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush excessively worn LOWER ARM FRONT BUSH (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Service brake excessively binding (1.2.1 (f))
Nearside Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (3.4 (b) (ii))
Nearside Rear Coil spring fractured or broken (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (3.4 (b) (ii))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush likely to become detached LOWER ARM FRONT BUSH (5.3.4 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Rear Exhaust silencer likely to become detached EXHAUST CLAMP MISSING & HANGER NOT ATTACHED (8.1.1 (b) (ii)) DANGEROUS
CENTER EXHAUST HEATSHEILD SLIGHTLY INSERCURE
Front REAR DIFFERNETIAL REAR BUSHES SPLIT/PERISHED
Offside Front Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Offside Rear HEADREST MISSING FROM THE SEAT
Oil leak, but not excessive REAR DIFFERENTIAL FRONT SEAL LEAKING (8.4.1 (a) (i))
SAT NAV FITTED TO WINDSCREEN
Nearside Rear UNABLE TO CHECK SEAT AND SEATBELT
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Horn not working (7.7 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Brake hose excessively twisted fouling on anti roll barlink (1.1.12 (b) (ii))
Nearside Rear Direction indicator incorrect colour (4.4.3 (a))
Offside Front Headlamp aim not tested (4.1.2 (b))
Offside Front Headlamp not working on dipped beam (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Nearside Front brake has slight bind
Nearside Rear Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Offside Headlamp not working on dipped beam (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
How Reliable is the Mercedes-benz Vito?
Based on 2,011,702 MOT tests across 164,434 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
NK65 LUB is a 2015 Mercedes-benz Vito in Grey with a 2,143cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 15 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 60%.
Across all 2015 Mercedes-benz Vito models, the average MOT pass rate is 77.6% with a typical mileage of 95,194 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Mercedes-benz Vito fails its MOT is parking brake: efficiency below requirements, accounting for 49,564 recorded failures. If you're considering buying NK65 LUB, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Mercedes-benz Vito typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 11 years old, this Mercedes-benz Vito is still in the earlier part of its expected life.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of NK65 LUB?
You can check the full history of NK65 LUB by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was NK65 LUB registered?
NK65 LUB is a 2015 Mercedes-benz Vito, first registered on 1 September 2015.
Is NK65 LUB safe to buy?
The MOT history for NK65 LUB shows 15 tests with a 60% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does NK65 LUB have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on NK65 LUB. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.