MOT Status
ValidMileage
92,482 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar ball joint excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Headlamp light intensity severely reduced (4.1.4 (a))
Offside Front Headlamp light intensity severely reduced (4.1.4 (a))
Offside Front Anti-roll bar ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Brake lever pivots slightly worn (1.1.1 (b))
Front Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint has slight play both (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material both (1.1.11 (c))
Front Coil spring corroded both (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Shock absorbers has a reduced damping effect both corroded (5.3.2 (d))
Nearside Front Headlamp lens slightly defective (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Headlamp lens slightly defective (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Rear Coil spring corroded both (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Registration plate insecure but not likely to fall off (0.1 (a))
Rear Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced both under body (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Front Headlamp are incorrectly positioned (4.1.4 (a))
Brake lever pivots slightly worn (1.1.1 (b))
Front Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint has slight play both (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material both (1.1.11 (c))
Front Coil spring corroded both (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Shock absorbers has a reduced damping effect both corroded (5.3.2 (d))
Nearside Front Headlamp lens slightly defective (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Headlamp lens slightly defective (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Rear Coil spring corroded both (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Registration plate insecure but not likely to fall off (0.1 (a))
Rear Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced both under body (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Front Shock absorbers has a reduced damping effect both corroded (5.3.2 (d))
Nearside Front Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Lower Coil spring corroded both (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Wiper blade split
Nearside Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (3.4 (b) (ii))
Nearside Rear Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of a single lamp or all lamps (4.7.1 (b) (ii))
Offside Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (3.4 (b) (ii))
Offside Rear Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of a single lamp or all lamps (4.7.1 (b) (ii))
Front Shock absorbers has a reduced damping effect both corroded (5.3.2 (d))
Nearside Front Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Lower Coil spring corroded both (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Wiper blade split
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both discs slight corrosion inner faces (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Nearside Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (4.7.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement inner rear bush separated (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive minor (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both axle bushes starting to split (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear exhaust box corroded / delaminating
Vehicles internal headlight adjuster altered to recheck lights ()
washer aims low
wipers slightly poor / judder
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both discs slight corrosion inner faces (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Headlamp aim too high both (4.1.2 (a))
Nearside Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (4.7.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement inner rear bush separated (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive minor (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both axle bushes starting to split (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear exhaust box corroded / delaminating
Vehicles internal headlight adjuster altered to recheck lights ()
washer aims low
wipers slightly poor / judder
Nearside Front Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge worn on outer edge 185/55v16 (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front coil spring broken (2.4.C.1a)
Nearside Front Outer Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.5.1g)
front brake discs heavily worn
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
oil leak
Nearside Front coil spring broken (2.4.C.1a)
How Reliable is the Nissan Note?
Based on 2,716,974 MOT tests across 180,658 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
NL11 ATU is a 2011 Nissan Note in Black with a 1,386cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 19 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 63.2%.
Across all 2011 Nissan Note models, the average MOT pass rate is 75.0% with a typical mileage of 53,723 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Nissan Note fails its MOT is coil spring broken, accounting for 38,645 recorded failures. If you're considering buying NL11 ATU, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Nissan Note typically stays on UK roads for around 20 years. At 15 years old, this Nissan Note is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of NL11 ATU?
You can check the full history of NL11 ATU by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was NL11 ATU registered?
NL11 ATU is a 2011 Nissan Note, first registered on 27 May 2011.
Is NL11 ATU safe to buy?
The MOT history for NL11 ATU shows 19 tests with a 63.2% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does NL11 ATU have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on NL11 ATU. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.