MOT Status
ValidMileage
82,213 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Brake cable damaged but not to excess hand brake cable mounts broken (1.1.15 (a))
Coil spring corroded front coil springs rusty (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive corrosion inner and outer sills and sill lips (7.1.1 (a) (i))
Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive corrosion subframes and suspension parts (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Sub-frame corroded and seriously weakened front subframe o/s (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Brake cable damaged but not to excess hand brake cable mounts broken (1.1.15 (a))
Coil spring corroded front coil springs rusty (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive corrosion inner and outer sills and sill lips (7.1.1 (a) (i))
Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive corrosion subframes and suspension parts (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Brake cable damaged but not to excess brackets on hand brake cables broken (1.1.15 (a))
Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive corrosion underside; subframes ,suspension parts and both sill lips (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement o/s/f lower arm rear bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
surface rust underneath
Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge on wear bars and high level tread bald on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement arm rear bush splitting (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule brake flexy hose ends corroded ,wax oiled (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement small split o/s/f lower arm rear bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
fuel filler neck rusty/ wax oiled
surface corrosion in places underside
Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material by brake hoses (1.1.11 (c))
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated (5.3.4 (b) (i))
surface rust underneath
Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material both by front brake hoses (1.1.11 (c))
surface rust underneath front and rear
Offside Front Macpherson strut attachment bracket/mounting insecure and impairing directional stability top mount has excessive movement (5.3.3 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material both by front brake hoses (1.1.11 (c))
Nearside Front strut top mount has slight movement
surface rust underneath front and rear
Offside Rear Child Seat fitted not allowing full inspection of adult belt ()
surface rust underneath front and rear
Offside Front Tyre has ply or cords exposed split in tread cord showing (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Child Seat fitted not allowing full inspection of adult belt ()
surface rust underneath front and rear
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both front in very poor condition on the inner face (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. front brake balance poor (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Child Seat fitted not allowing full inspection of adult belt ()
Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge n/s/f tyre worn low on the edge (5.2.3 (e))
corrosion front and rear subframes , rack mount , anti roll bar mounts , fuel filler neck and return pipe
Nearside Rear Service brake excessively binding (1.2.1 (f))
Rear Brakes imbalanced across an axle (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both front in very poor condition on the inner face (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. front brake balance poor (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Electrical wiring inadequately secured battery terminals (4.11 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Child Seat fitted not allowing full inspection of adult belt ()
Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge n/s/f tyre worn low on the edge (5.2.3 (e))
corrosion front and rear subframes , rack mount , anti roll bar mounts , fuel filler neck and return pipe
unable to test n/s/r wheel bearing due to brake bind , this will be tested on retest
Front brake discs corroded/ pitted on inner faces
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm has excessive play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm has excessive play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
Supplementary Restraint System warning lamp indicates a fault (5.4.2)
Front brake discs corroded/ pitted on inner faces
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Parking brake lever has little reserve travel (3.1.6b)
How Reliable is the Suzuki Splash?
Based on 286,838 MOT tests across 19,885 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
NX58 SVO is a 2008 Suzuki Splash in Green with a 1,242cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 21 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 76.2%.
Across all 2008 Suzuki Splash models, the average MOT pass rate is 74.2% with a typical mileage of 49,919 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Suzuki Splash fails its MOT is coil spring broken, accounting for 3,325 recorded failures. If you're considering buying NX58 SVO, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Suzuki Splash typically stays on UK roads for around 18 years. At 18 years old, this Suzuki Splash is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of NX58 SVO?
You can check the full history of NX58 SVO by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was NX58 SVO registered?
NX58 SVO is a 2008 Suzuki Splash, first registered on 1 September 2008.
Is NX58 SVO safe to buy?
The MOT history for NX58 SVO shows 21 tests with a 76.2% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does NX58 SVO have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on NX58 SVO. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.