MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
40,714 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Coolant leak Slight leak between radiator and radiator hose ()
Exhaust slightly loose (6.1.2 (a))
Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Lower frame (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Swinging arm (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Rear Road spring mounting corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.1 (b) (i))
All direction indicators not working (4.4.1 (a) (ii))
Coolant leak Slight leak between radiator and radiator hose ()
Exhaust slightly loose (6.1.2 (a))
Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Lower frame (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Swinging arm (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Rear Road spring mounting corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Exhaust silencer slightly loose (8.1.1 (b) (i))
Rear Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Rear Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrules (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Rear Lower Road spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
fork dust seals corroded left and right
swingarm corroded
Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced lower frame (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced swing arm (6.1.1 (c) (i))
fork dust covers corroded
general corrosion on most metal bits of the bike
Rear Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced swingarm (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (5.2.3 (e))
fork dust seals corroded left and right
Exhaust silencer slightly loose (8.1.1 (b) (i))
Front Shock absorber has slight external damage to the casing dust seals corroded (5.3.2 (b))
Rear Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrules (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Rear Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced swing arm corroded (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Valve stem slightly damaged (5.2.3 (j))
Wheel corroded but not to excess front and rear (5.2.2 (c) (i))
Exhaust silencer slightly loose not likely to become detached (8.1.1 (b) (i))
Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced swingarm, frame and wheel rim (Front and rear) (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit sides wearing unevenly (5.2.3 (e))
Indicator switch defective (1.5.4)
Indicator switch does not operate the direction indicators on the side selected (1.5.4)
Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (3.2.A1f(i))
Steering headbearing has slight free play (2.2.2)
Exhaust is leaking but is not excessively noisey (7.1.1b)
Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (3.2.A1f(i))
Rear Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (3.2.A1f(i))
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Upper Steering headbearing has slight free play (2.2.2)
Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.2.A1f(i))
Rear Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.2.A1f(i))
Front Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (4.1.3(ii))
Rear Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (4.1.3(ii))
Front Front shock absorber seal failed and leaking oil (2.3.3)
Rear Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (4.1.3(ii))
How Reliable is the Honda NT650V?
Based on 55,724 MOT tests across 4,370 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
OY02 WCU is a 2002 Honda NT650V in Red with a 647cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 24 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 79.2%.
Across all 2002 Honda NT650V models, the average MOT pass rate is 85.4% with a typical mileage of 24,590 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Honda NT650V fails its MOT is tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm, accounting for 1,032 recorded failures. If you're considering buying OY02 WCU, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Honda NT650V typically stays on UK roads for around 28 years. At 24 years old, this Honda NT650V is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of OY02 WCU?
You can check the full history of OY02 WCU by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was OY02 WCU registered?
OY02 WCU is a 2002 Honda NT650V, first registered on 30 April 2002.
Is OY02 WCU safe to buy?
The MOT history for OY02 WCU shows 24 tests with a 79.2% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does OY02 WCU have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on OY02 WCU. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.