MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
339,497 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Emissions not tested (7.4.B.1)
Nearside Rear Anti-roll bar rubber mounting deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear Anti-roll bar attachment bracket/mounting fractured (2.4.G.1)
Offside Rear Anti-roll bar rubber mounting deteriorated resulting in excessive movement bush missing (2.4.G.2)
Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively both (8.2.2)
Nearside Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded inner sill (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Headlamp not working on dipped beam (1.7.5a)
Nearside Rear Anti-roll bar linkage has excessive play in a pin/bush (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded inner sill (2.4.A.3)
Power steering component(s) leaking (2.3.3b)
Registration plate lamp not working both (1.1.C.1d)
Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.5.1g)
Front Subframe mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Front brake disc in such a condition that it is seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Nearside Front constant velocity joint gaiter deteriorated to the extent that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc (2.5.C.1a)
Offside Front constant velocity joint gaiter deteriorated to the extent that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc (2.5.C.1a)
Offside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Parking brake lever has no reserve travel (3.1.6b)
Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Emissions not tested (7.0)
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint dust cover excessively deteriorated so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm has excessive play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
Rear Exhaust has a major leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
Nearside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Nearside Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Offside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Offside Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Front Bonnet retaining device ineffective (8.4.2)
Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Offside Front Suspension arm has excessive play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear All position lamps not working (1.1.A.3b)
Offside Rear Rear fog lamp does not emit a steady red light (1.3.2e)
Offside Rear Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
Steering system fouling (2.2.D.2a)
(1.1.7d)The rear Fog Lamp switch does not make it clear as to its intended function,and ideally requires a label to identify it as such.
(1.6B1.2)The Nearside front driving dipped beam headlamp aim is set at the upper horizontal limit of 0.5%
(1.6B1.2)The offside front driving dipped beam headlamp aim is set at the upper horizontal limit of 0.5%
(2.4G.3)The nearside and offside front suspension antiroll bar linkage rods ball pins are slightly worn and the dust cover is split
(3.3A.1d)The service brake pedal has side movement present at right angles to the normal movement indicating wear forming within the bearings
(3.5.1h)The nearside front brake disc faces are scored
(3.5.1h)The offside front brake disc faces are scored
(4.1D1)The nearside rear tyre is worn close to the legal limit
(4.1D1)The offside rear tyre is worn close to the legal limit
(5.1B.6)The offside rear seat belt anchorage point is manufactured from wood and may not comply with Type Approval Regulations.
(8.3.1e)The Phone Holder secured within the drivers view of the road should not be fitted,as indeed any items larger than 040mm diameter should not be secured to the windscreen
The odometer fitted within the instrument display is calibrated in kmh,and requires to be claibrated in mph for this Country,recommend the presenter to take advice from VOSA.
Nearside Front Steering rack gaiter split (2.2.D.2d)
Offside Rear Fuel cap/sealing device does not fasten securely maintaining the sealing arrangement (7.2.4b)
(1.1.7d)The rear Fog Lamp switch does not make it clear as to its intended function,and ideally requires a label to identify it as such.
(1.6B1.2)The Nearside front driving dipped beam headlamp aim is set at the upper horizontal limit of 0.5%
(1.6B1.2)The offside front driving dipped beam headlamp aim is set at the upper horizontal limit of 0.5%
(2.4G.3)The nearside and offside front suspension antiroll bar linkage rods ball pins are slightly worn and the dust cover is split
(3.3A.1d)The service brake pedal has side movement present at right angles to the normal movement indicating wear forming within the bearings
(3.5.1h)The nearside front brake disc faces are scored
(3.5.1h)The offside front brake disc faces are scored
(4.1D1)The nearside rear tyre is worn close to the legal limit
(4.1D1)The offside rear tyre is worn close to the legal limit
(5.1B.6)The nearside rear seat belt anchorage prescribed area is manufactured from wood,and appears not to conform to the Type Approval Regulations.Recommend to contact VOSA and take professional advice?
(8.3.1e)The Phone Holder secured within the drivers view of the road should not be fitted,as indeed any items larger than 040mm diameter should not be secured to the windscreen
The odometer fitted within the instrument display is calibrated in kmh,and requires to be claibrated in mph for this Country,recommend the presenter to take advice from VOSA.
Nearside Front constant velocity joint gaiter split (2.5.C.1a)
Offside Front constant velocity joint gaiter split (2.5.C.1a)
Service brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.C.1a)
both front tyres wearing on inner and outter edges
Nearside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear fog lamp missing (1.3.2a)
How Reliable is the Mazda Bongo?
Based on 251,584 MOT tests across 14,362 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
P624 OET is a 1997 Mazda Bongo in Silver with a 2,490cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 18 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 55.6%.
Across all 1997 Mazda Bongo models, the average MOT pass rate is 66.3% with a typical mileage of 131,832 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Mazda Bongo fails its MOT is fog lamp not working, accounting for 6,854 recorded failures. If you're considering buying P624 OET, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Mazda Bongo typically stays on UK roads for around 31 years. At 29 years old, this Mazda Bongo is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of P624 OET?
You can check the full history of P624 OET by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was P624 OET registered?
P624 OET is a 1997 Mazda Bongo, first registered on 1 May 1997.
Is P624 OET safe to buy?
The MOT history for P624 OET shows 18 tests with a 55.6% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does P624 OET have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on P624 OET. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.