MOT Status
ValidMileage
163,233 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
Nearside Windscreen damaged and affecting the driver's view of the road (3.2 (a) (ii))
Offside Rear Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (1.1.13 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened ALL Brake Discs heavily pitted around edges. (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Brake pad(s) wearing thin ALL Brake Pads low. (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge 3mm (5.2.3 (e))
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened ALL Brake Discs slightly worn & pitted. (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Brake pad(s) wearing thin ALL Brake Pads. (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Exhaust noisy (8.1.1 (a))
Nearside Rear Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Inner Front Bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Inner Front Bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Track rod end ball joint has excessive play (2.1.3 (b) (i))
Offside Front Track rod end ball joint has excessive play (2.1.3 (b) (i))
Offside Front Tyre has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened ALL Brake Discs slightly worn & pitted. (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Brake pad(s) wearing thin ALL Brake Pads. (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Exhaust noisy (8.1.1 (a))
Nearside Rear Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Inner Front Bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Inner Front Bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint excessively worn Forward arm. (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Track rod end ball joint has excessive play (2.1.3 (b) (i))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint excessively worn Forward arm. (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Track rod end ball joint has excessive play (2.1.3 (b) (i))
Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm Also small cuts down to canvas. (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened ALL 4 DISC'S pitted rusty and scored, but not seriously weakened. (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Brake pad(s) wearing thin ALL FRONT AND REAR PADS LOW. (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Exhaust noisy Sings of silencer box's removed. (8.1.1 (a))
Nearside Front Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output but not seriously reducing light output (4.1.4 (b))
Nearside Front Lower Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Bush de-bonding. (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output Tinting product but not seriously reducing light output (4.1.4 (b))
Offside Rear Position lamp light intensity obviously reduced (4.2.3 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Bush de-bonding. (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Exhaust mounting defective Mounts wearing through rubber supports. (6.1.2 (a))
Rear Position lamp light intensity obviously reduced (4.2.3 (a) (i))
front tyres worn on edges
Nearside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge on limit (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear nail in tyre
front tyres worn on edges
Window excessively tinted but not adversely affecting driver's view all windows (3.2 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Lower Suspension arm pin or bush excessively worn rear outer (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Parking brake efficiency below requirements (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement rear outer (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Window excessively tinted but not adversely affecting driver's view all windows (3.2 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Nail in tyre ()
Window excessively tinted but not adversely affecting driver's view all windows (both sides) (3.2 (b) (i))
Offside Front Wheel bearing has excessive play (5.1.3 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Nail in tyre ()
Window excessively tinted but not adversely affecting driver's view all windows (both sides) (3.2 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Track rod end ball joint has slight play (2.2.B.1f)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Track rod end ball joint has slight play (2.2.B.1f)
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Parking brake ratchet feels worn intermittently .
Nearside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Nearside Front tyre edges wearing thin
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Rear suspension arm bushes separating
Offside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Offside Front tyre edges wearing thin
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear suspension arm bushes separating
How Reliable is the BMW 635?
Based on 51,017 MOT tests across 4,019 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
PG10 JJK is a 2010 BMW 635 in Silver with a 2,993cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 15 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 60%.
Across all 2010 BMW 635 models, the average MOT pass rate is 82.4% with a typical mileage of 78,458 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a BMW 635 fails its MOT is suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded, accounting for 1,161 recorded failures. If you're considering buying PG10 JJK, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The BMW 635 typically stays on UK roads for around 43 years. At 16 years old, this BMW 635 is still in the earlier part of its expected life.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of PG10 JJK?
You can check the full history of PG10 JJK by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was PG10 JJK registered?
PG10 JJK is a 2010 BMW 635, first registered on 28 May 2010.
Is PG10 JJK safe to buy?
The MOT history for PG10 JJK shows 15 tests with a 60% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does PG10 JJK have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on PG10 JJK. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.