MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
191,411 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Front Side repeater insecure DOOR MIRROW INDICATOR LENS (4.4.1 (c) (i))
Bonnet cannot be secured in the closed position (3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Headlamp are incorrectly positioned (4.1.4 (a))
Nearside Front Tyre has a bulge, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Nearside Front Side repeater insecure DOOR MIRROW INDICATOR LENS (4.4.1 (c) (i))
Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick both, (1.1.13 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Exhaust emits dense blue smoke at idle (8.2.1.2 (f))
Exhaust emits visible black smoke at idle (8.2.1.2 (f))
Offside Rear Rear fog lamp not working (4.5.1 (a) (ii))
Rear Other passenger door cannot be opened from outside the vehicle boot (6.2.3 (a))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both, (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both, (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin both, (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Rear Coil spring corroded both, (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Other boot or passenger door catch deteriorated so the door cannot be readily opened or closed
Rear Service brake binding but not excessively both, (1.2.1 (f))
Rear Shock absorbers has a reduced damping effect both, (5.3.2 (d))
vehicle interior or rear boot, load or other items, would prevent a proper test being carried out - unless the load removed. boot pane structure not allowing full inspection,
Engine MIL inoperative or indicates a malfunction (8.2.1.2 (h))
Nearside Rear Suspension arm pin or bush excessively worn (trailing arm) (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Nearside Rear Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (1.1.13 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
nearside rear brakes grinding with pads.
offside rear suspension trailing arm bush perished.
Nearside Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Offside Rear Inner Road wheel slightly distorted (5.2.2 (c) (i))
Offside Rear Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (4.7.1 (b) (i))
Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Headlamp aim so that beam "kick up" is not visible on the screen (4.1.2 (a))
N/S AND THE O/S REAR TYRES ARE STARTING TO GO OUT OF SHAPE
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
N/S AND THE O/S REAR COIL SPRINGS ARE RUSTY
Nearside Headlamp aim too low (1.8)
Offside Headlamp aim too high (1.8)
Nearside Rear Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.5.1g) DANGEROUS
CUTS IN THE N/S FRONT TYRE BUT NOT TO CORDS
N/S AND THE O/S REAR COIL SPRINGS ARE RUSTY
N/S AND THE O/S REAR TYRES ARE LOW ON TREAD
Nearside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened INNER FACE (3.5.1i)
Offside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened INNER FACE (3.5.1i)
REAR BRAKE DISCS ARE IN POOR CONDITION
offside and nearside front disc slightly corroded.
offside front disc slight corrosion.
Engine covers fitted obscuring some components in the engine bay
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Under-trays fitted obscuring some underside components
How Reliable is the Ford Mondeo?
Based on 12,239,875 MOT tests across 1,205,291 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
PJ61 TWC is a 2012 Ford Mondeo in Silver with a 1,997cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 12 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 58.3%.
Across all 2012 Ford Mondeo models, the average MOT pass rate is 77.5% with a typical mileage of 89,688 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Ford Mondeo fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 610,562 recorded failures. If you're considering buying PJ61 TWC, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Mondeo typically stays on UK roads for around 33 years. At 14 years old, this Ford Mondeo is still in the earlier part of its expected life.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of PJ61 TWC?
You can check the full history of PJ61 TWC by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was PJ61 TWC registered?
PJ61 TWC is a 2012 Ford Mondeo, first registered on 21 February 2012.
Is PJ61 TWC safe to buy?
The MOT history for PJ61 TWC shows 12 tests with a 58.3% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does PJ61 TWC have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on PJ61 TWC. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.