MOT Status
ValidMileage
66,086 miAbove average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Anti-roll bar linkage pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement bushes splitting but not resulting in movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Brake disc worn, but not excessively both fronts (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material both rear rigid pipes covered in grease and slightly corroded (1.1.11 (c))
Coil spring corroded both fronts (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Coil spring corroded both rears (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Exhaust mounting defective front one broken but still secure (6.1.2 (a))
Headlamp lens slightly defective both lenses bleached (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Service brake binding but not excessively slight bind (1.2.1 (f))
Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources 1 of 2 inop (4.7.1 (b) (i))
Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened front (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened rear beam but not affecting rigidity or structure (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Sub-frame pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both rears (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both fronts at rear large bushes cracking but no movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
rear cill sections both sides corroded but not holed
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both fronts (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material rear brake pipes on joint slightly rusty (1.1.11 (c))
Coil spring corroded both rears (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Service brake binding but not excessively both rears slightly binding due to being stood (1.2.1 (f))
Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened rear beam corroded but not holed (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Sub-frame pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both rear axel bushes perishing but no movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both front large rear bushes worn but not affecting stability (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Anti-roll bar pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both front drop link bushes splitting but not affecting usage (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material both rear brake pipe joints corroded but not leaking (1.1.11 (c))
Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output both headlight lens discoloured but not affecting output (4.1.4 (b))
Nearside Rear Service brake binding but not excessively slightly binding (1.2.1 (f))
Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both front rear bushes in both arms perishing but not affecting structure (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar linkage pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement cracking in rubber (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Inner Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Inner Sub-frame pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement rear axel bush perishing but no movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Anti-roll bar linkage pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement cracking in rubber (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Inner Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Inner Sub-frame pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement axel bush perishing but no movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Inner Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing tread cracking (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened rear beam corroding but structure still perfect (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Central Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened corroded but not affecting function (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Service brake excessively binding (1.2.1 (f))
Nearside Rear Stop lamp not working (1.2.1b)
Offside Rear Stop lamp not working (1.2.1b)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Rear Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords (4.1.D.1a) DANGEROUS
Offside Rear Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords (4.1.D.1a) DANGEROUS
How Reliable is the Peugeot 107?
Based on 2,229,410 MOT tests across 139,779 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
PK09 MYL is a 2009 Peugeot 107 in Orange with a 998cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 20 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 80%.
Across all 2009 Peugeot 107 models, the average MOT pass rate is 76.0% with a typical mileage of 50,720 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Peugeot 107 fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 42,280 recorded failures. If you're considering buying PK09 MYL, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Peugeot 107 typically stays on UK roads for around 21 years. At 17 years old, this Peugeot 107 is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of PK09 MYL?
You can check the full history of PK09 MYL by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was PK09 MYL registered?
PK09 MYL is a 2009 Peugeot 107, first registered on 31 March 2009.
Is PK09 MYL safe to buy?
The MOT history for PK09 MYL shows 20 tests with a 80% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does PK09 MYL have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on PK09 MYL. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.