MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
96,562 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Anti-roll bar pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both front inner D shaped bushes (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Offside Rear brake has slight bind and handbrake performance is down
both front tyres worn on inner edges
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both sides (3.5.1i)
Front slight corrosion on brake pipes both sides
Offside Rear Inner tyre wearing
slight corrosion on sills both sides
Offside Front Headlamp not working on main beam (1.7.5a)
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened bothsides (3.5.1i)
Front brake pipes have slight corrosion
Offside Rear inner edge wearing on tyre
slight corrosion on sill both sides
both front brake discs are corroded on the inner faces
engine/gear box oil leaks
general rust to the rear chassis sections
slight binding to the o/s/r brake
the n/s/f brake hose is deteriorated
traction and engine warning lights on dash display
wiper blades could be better
Anti-lock braking system warning lamp indicates an ABS fault (3.4.1c)
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded inner and outer sill (2.4.A.3)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
engine/gear box oil leaks
both front brake discs are corroded on the inner faces
general rust to the rear chassis sections
the n/s/f brake hose is deteriorated
traction and engine warning lights on dash display
wiper blades could be better
some corrosion to the rear brake hose ferrols
Nearside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Offside rear parking brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.6a)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
some corrosion to both rear brake hose ferrols
Nearside Rear Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrules (3.6.B.4e)
Nearside Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Nearside Rear Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrules (3.6.B.4e)
Offside Rear Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
header tank insecure
metal in o/s/r tyre
oil leak
oil warning light illuminates itermittently on the dash display
possible coolant leak
Offside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Nearside Rear Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrules (3.6.B.4e)
Nearside Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Nearside Rear Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrules (3.6.B.4e)
Offside Rear Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
header tank insecure
metal in o/s/r tyre
oil leak
oil warning light illuminates itermittently on the dash display
possible coolant leak
Offside Front coil spring fractured (2.4.C.1a)
Both front tyres worn inner edges
Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Hi-level stop lamp in-op.
Nearside and offside front lower arm rear mounting bushes just starting to deteriorate/seperate.
Nearside and offside rear axle beam mounting bushes deteriorated.
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Inner Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
How Reliable is the Ford Puma?
Based on 713,333 MOT tests across 56,808 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
PL02 DCV is a 2002 Ford Puma in Silver with a 1,679cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 18 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 72.2%.
Across all 2002 Ford Puma models, the average MOT pass rate is 71.0% with a typical mileage of 65,164 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Ford Puma fails its MOT is brake pipe excessively corroded, accounting for 62,649 recorded failures. If you're considering buying PL02 DCV, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Puma typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 24 years old, this Ford Puma is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of PL02 DCV?
You can check the full history of PL02 DCV by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was PL02 DCV registered?
PL02 DCV is a 2002 Ford Puma, first registered on 31 May 2002.
Is PL02 DCV safe to buy?
The MOT history for PL02 DCV shows 18 tests with a 72.2% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does PL02 DCV have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on PL02 DCV. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.