MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
119,626 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material rear (1.1.11 (c))
Emissions unable to be completed Exhaust excessively "blowing" (8.2.1.2 (d))
Engine MIL inoperative or indicates a malfunction (8.2.1.2 (h))
Exhaust noise is clearly in excess of that emitted by a similar vehicle fitted with a standard silencer in average condition (8.1.1 (a))
Front Exhaust has a major leak of exhaust gases At Cat (6.1.2 (a))
Nearside Front Body component damaged and likely to cause injury Door lock missing (6.2.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Brake pipe excessively corroded As marked (1.1.11 (c))
Nearside Front Position lamp light intensity significantly reduced (4.2.3 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Suspension arm pin or bush excessively worn Rear bush as marked (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Nearside Rear Inner Brake pipe excessively corroded Around fuel tank, as marked (1.1.11 (c))
Nearside Rear Parking brake inoperative on one side (1.4.1 (a))
Nearside Rear Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Suspension arm pin or bush excessively worn Rear bush as marked (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Parking brake efficiency below requirements (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule All...Replacement recommended (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Corrosion to all prescribed areas, front/rear sub frames, all suspension and all brake components
Front Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Front Outer Both drive shaft retaining nut locking devices slightly in secure
Nearside Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material Both... front to back ...Replacement recommended (1.1.11 (c))
Nearside Rear Outer Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material Replacement recommended (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material Replacement recommended (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Front Outer Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot severely deteriorated Replacement recommended (6.1.7 (g) (i))
Offside Rear Outer Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material Replacement recommended (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Rear Service brake fluctuating, but not excessively (1.2.1 (e))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Front Inner Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Front hub nuts incorrectly locked off
Nearside track rod end and lower ball joints locking devices inadequate
Offside Front Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot severely deteriorated (6.1.7 (g) (i))
Rear Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. slight lag in o/s/r performance (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Front Inner Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Front hub nuts incorrectly locked off
Nearside track rod end and lower ball joints locking devices inadequate
Offside Front Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot severely deteriorated (6.1.7 (g) (i))
Offside Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Rear Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. slight lag in o/s/r performance (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Suspension arm damaged but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Outer Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot severely deteriorated (6.1.7 (g) (i))
Front Brake pad(s) worn down to wear indicator (1.1.13 (a) (i))
Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of a single lamp or all lamps (4.7.1 (b) (ii))
Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (3.5 (a))
Nearside Front Suspension arm damaged but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Outer Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot severely deteriorated (6.1.7 (g) (i))
Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both front (5.3.4 (a) (i))
coolant level low
Stop lamp(s) not working both (4.3.1 (a) (ii))
Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both front (5.3.4 (a) (i))
coolant level low
Nearside Rear Shock absorbers has slight external damage to the casing both rear shockers (5.3.2 (b))
Nearside Front Brake disc significantly and obviously worn both front disc's (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Shock absorbers has slight external damage to the casing both rear shockers (5.3.2 (b))
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
How Reliable is the Suzuki Alto?
Based on 1,154,186 MOT tests across 84,341 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
PX60 YFD is a 2010 Suzuki Alto in Green with a 996cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 17 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 64.7%.
Across all 2010 Suzuki Alto models, the average MOT pass rate is 76.2% with a typical mileage of 45,738 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Suzuki Alto fails its MOT is brake pipe excessively corroded, accounting for 33,718 recorded failures. If you're considering buying PX60 YFD, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Suzuki Alto typically stays on UK roads for around 28 years. At 16 years old, this Suzuki Alto is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of PX60 YFD?
You can check the full history of PX60 YFD by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was PX60 YFD registered?
PX60 YFD is a 2010 Suzuki Alto, first registered on 29 September 2010.
Is PX60 YFD safe to buy?
The MOT history for PX60 YFD shows 17 tests with a 64.7% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does PX60 YFD have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on PX60 YFD. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.