MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
252,934 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
General corrosion under side of vehicle
Nearside Front King pin has slight play
Nearside Rear Service brake requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair (1.2.1 (c))
Offside Front King pin has slight play
Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material to front by brake load sensor (1.1.11 (c))
Rear Prop shaft joint worn, but not excessively (6.1.7 (c) (i))
Steering box has slight free play detected at steering wheel (2.3 (a) (i))
General corrosion under side of vehicle
Nearside Front King pin has slight free play
Offside Front Inner Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front King pin has slight free play
Offside Front Wheel bearing slightly noisy (5.1.3 (b) (i))
Rear prop shaft U/J worn
Central Drive shaft joint worn, but not excessively (6.1.7 (c) (i))
General corrosion under side of vehicle
Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material to front (1.1.11 (c))
Battery insecure but not likely to fall from carrier (4.13 (a) (i))
Central Prop shaft joint worn, but not excessively universal joint (6.1.7 (c) (i))
Front Inner Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge edge (n/s and o/s (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Rear Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced wheel arch and inner bumper (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive engine, dip stick (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Power steering component has slight seepage from a component steering box (2.1.5 (a))
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced battery box (6.1.1 (c) (i))
underside of vehicle showing signs of light surface corrosion
Nearside Rear Suspension spring mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (2.4.A.3)
oil leak from engine.
rear brake fluctuating, but not excessively (3.7.B.3)
Front brake disc in such a condition that it is seriously weakened both sides. (3.5.1i)
Nearside Front Brake pipe excessively corroded from brake hose to caliper x2 (3.6.B.2c)
Nearside Front Brake pipe excessively corroded from brake hose to master cylinder x2. (3.6.B.2c)
Nearside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Rear rear parking brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.6a)
Offside Front Brake pipe excessively corroded from brake hose to caliper x2. (3.6.B.2c)
Offside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Parking brake lever has no reserve travel (3.1.6b)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Nearside Front Axle king pin has slight play in pin and/or bush (2.5.A.3a)
Nearside Rear Suspension spring mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (2.4.A.3)
Offside Front Axle king pin has slight play in pin and/or bush (2.5.A.3a)
Power steering component(s) has slight seepage from a seal steering box. (2.3.3b)
oil leak from engine.
rear brake fluctuating, but not excessively (3.7.B.3)
Nearside Passenger seat(s) missing at time of test ()
Oil leak engine area ()
Steering box has a slight oil leak (2.2.D.2e)
Stub axle has slight vertical movement between stub axle and axle beam both front (2.5.A.1a)
Tyre worn close to the legal limit both rear (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Rear Vehicle structure has slight corrosion (6.1.A.1)
Offside Parking brake: parking brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.7)
Offside Rear Vehicle structure has slight corrosion (6.1.A.1)
corrosion in o/s and n/s rear inner sills
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Battery insecure (1.9.1)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Rear registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Front Axle king pin has slight play in pin and/or bush (2.5.A.3a)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Axle king pin has slight play in pin and/or bush (2.5.A.3a)
Steering system has slight free play detected at steering wheel (2.2.A.1a)
Front Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded (5.2.6)
Nearside rear brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.5a)
Service brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
O/s/r footbrake efficency close to limit.
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
How Reliable is the Ldv Convoy?
Based on 522,399 MOT tests across 52,120 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
R248 TJU is a 1998 Ldv Convoy in Multi-colour with a 2,500cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 21 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 76.2%.
Across all 1998 Ldv Convoy models, the average MOT pass rate is 61.8% with a typical mileage of 93,117 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Ldv Convoy fails its MOT is parking brake: efficiency below requirements, accounting for 29,934 recorded failures. If you're considering buying R248 TJU, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ldv Convoy typically stays on UK roads for around 30 years. At 28 years old, this Ldv Convoy is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of R248 TJU?
You can check the full history of R248 TJU by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was R248 TJU registered?
R248 TJU is a 1998 Ldv Convoy, first registered on 24 April 1998.
Is R248 TJU safe to buy?
The MOT history for R248 TJU shows 21 tests with a 76.2% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does R248 TJU have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on R248 TJU. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.