MOT Status
ValidMileage
71,156 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Front mudguard rear fixing missing damaged.
Rear Road spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Rear fixing missing/damaged.
Rear Road spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Fender fixing missing.
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Brake indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (1.2.1 (e))
Rear Road spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Nearside Front Fender fixing missing.
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Brake indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (1.2.1 (e))
Rear Road spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Fender fixing damaged
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Brake indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (1.2.1 (e))
Rear Road spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Chain and sprockets worn.
Front mudguard fixing damaged
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Brake indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (1.2.1 (e))
Rear Road spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (5.2.3 (e))
Front mudguard bolt snapped/damaged.
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (1.1.13 (a))
Rear Road spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Wheel alignment slightly misaligned (2.4 (a))
Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Front frame/engine support bracket. (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Steering headbearing slightly stiff or notchy (2.2.2 (f) (i))
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (5.2.3 (e))
Throttle housing not sat correctly, advise attention.
Drive chain worn but not considered excessive rollers loose (6.2.1e)
Front Brake disc(s) slightly worn (3.2.A1l)
Front Roller brake test indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (3.3.A1d)
Rear Drive chain sprocket slightly worn teeth worn (6.2.1e)
Rear Roller brake test indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (3.3.A1d)
Wheel alignment slightly misaligned. (2.5.1)
Exhaust noisy (7.1.2)
Rear Roller brake test indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (3.3.A1d)
Rear shock absorber has a light misting (2.4.A.1c)
Front Brake pad(s) (sintered type) less than 1.0mm thick (3.2A1f(ii))
Front Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (4.1.3(ii))
Motorcycle structure excessively corroded (6.1.1a)
Stop lamp does not illuminate immediately a brake applies Rear switch (1.3.1a)
Exhaust noisy (7.1.2)
Rear Roller brake test indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (3.3.A1d)
Rear shock absorber has a light misting (2.4.A.1c)
Rear shock absorber has a light misting (2.4.A.1c)
Steering movement slightly 'notchy' (2.2.1b)
Brake pedal insecure Retaining clip missing (3.1.2a)
Drive chain excessively loose (6.2.1d)
Drive chain worn to excess (6.2.1e)
Headlamp aim too low (1.6)
Rear Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (4.1.3(ii))
Stop lamp does not illuminate immediately a brake applies Rear switch (1.3.1a)
Rear shock absorber has a light misting (2.4.A.1c)
Steering movement slightly 'notchy' (2.2.1b)
Rear shock absorber has a light misting (2.4.A.1c)
Rear reflector on motorcycle missing (1.4.1)
Rear shock absorber has a light misting (2.4.A.1c)
Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (3.2A1f(ii))
Steering movement slightly 'notchy' (2.2.1b)
Drive chain slightly loose (6.2.1d)
Exhaust is leaking but is not excessively noisey (7.1.1b)
Exhaust slightly deteriorated (7.1.1a)
Front Brake disc(s) slightly worn (3.2.A1l)
Front Tyre valve stem slightly damaged (4.1.2c)
Number plate light inop
Rear Brake disc(s) slightly scored (3.2.A1l)
Rear Brake disc(s) slightly worn (3.2.A1l)
Steering movement slightly 'notchy' (2.2.1b)
Nearside Exhaust mounting does not fully support the exhaust system (7.1.1.c)
Nearside Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.2.A1f(i))
Offside Exhaust mounting does not fully support the exhaust system (7.1.1.c)
Rear Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.2.A1f(i)) DANGEROUS
NUMBER PLATE LIGHT INOP
ONE REAR POSITION BULB DOES NOT ILLUMINATE IN A TWO BULB SYSTEM
Rear Brake disc(s) excessively worn (3.2.A1l)
Rear Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.2.A1f(i)) DANGEROUS
Rear wheel bearings have excessive free play (2.4.A.2c) DANGEROUS
Drive chain slightly loose (6.2.1d)
How Reliable is the Honda CB900?
Based on 27,554 MOT tests across 2,614 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
RD53 AZP is a 2004 Honda CB900 in Blue with a 919cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 27 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 77.8%.
Across all 2004 Honda CB900 models, the average MOT pass rate is 85.9% with a typical mileage of 14,954 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Honda CB900 fails its MOT is tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm, accounting for 312 recorded failures. If you're considering buying RD53 AZP, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Honda CB900 typically stays on UK roads for around 47 years. At 22 years old, this Honda CB900 is still in the earlier part of its expected life.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of RD53 AZP?
You can check the full history of RD53 AZP by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was RD53 AZP registered?
RD53 AZP is a 2004 Honda CB900, first registered on 13 February 2004.
Is RD53 AZP safe to buy?
The MOT history for RD53 AZP shows 27 tests with a 77.8% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does RD53 AZP have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on RD53 AZP. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.