MOT Status
ValidMileage
82,918 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Central Rear Registration plate lamp does not illuminate simultaneously with the position lamps (4.7.2 (a))
Nearside Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Nearside Rear Direction indicator incorrect colour (4.4.3 (a))
Offside Front Headlamp aim too low (4.1.2 (a))
Offside Front Headlamp insecure (4.1.1 (c))
Nearside Rear Shock absorbers has an excessively worn bush (5.3.2 (c))
Offside Front Shock absorbers has a serious fluid leak (5.3.2 (b))
Offside Obligatory mirror seriously damaged, affecting the rear view (3.3 (b) (ii))
Offside Rear Shock absorbers has an excessively worn bush (5.3.2 (c))
Coil spring corroded both rear (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Nearside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing slight cracking (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Offside Front Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Seat belt webbing slightly damaged or frayed (7.1.2 (b) (ii))
Rear Coil spring mounting corroded but not seriously weakened nearside and offside (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing cracking in both front tyres,also slight wear on edge 195/50 15 (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
bonnet slightly damaged
offside front light unit slightly insecure
Offside Headlamp aim too low (4.1.2 (a))
Coil spring corroded both rear (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Nearside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing slight cracking (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Offside Front Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Seat belt webbing slightly damaged or frayed (7.1.2 (b) (ii))
Rear Coil spring mounting corroded but not seriously weakened nearside and offside (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing cracking in both front tyres,also slight wear on edge 195/50 15 (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
bonnet slightly damaged
offside front light unit slightly insecure
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
front end damage bonnet/bumper etc!
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread damaged (0.1 (b))
Front end damaged
Nearside Headlamp lens slightly defective unit damaged (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Offside Headlamp lens slightly defective unit damaged (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Rear both lamps have some condensation in unit
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread damaged (0.1 (b))
Front end damaged
Nearside headlamp unit damaged
Offside headlamp unit damaged
Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick both (1.1.13 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread damaged (0.1 (b))
Front end damaged
Nearside headlamp unit damaged
Offside headlamp unit damaged
Front Inner Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Front registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Exhaust system corroded
Front registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Offside Front Macpherson strut has slight movement at the upper attachment (2.5.A.1c)
Offside Front Tyre cracked on sidewall
both front tyres wearing down on inner edges
front number plate in poor condition cracked
rear exhaust silencer in poor condition corroded
REAR SILENCER POOR CONDITION
How Reliable is the Ford Ka?
Based on 8,818,307 MOT tests across 675,715 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
RF09 HFK is a 2009 Ford Ka in Red with a 1,242cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 19 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 78.9%.
Across all 2009 Ford Ka models, the average MOT pass rate is 75.5% with a typical mileage of 50,765 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Ford Ka fails its MOT is suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded, accounting for 404,005 recorded failures. If you're considering buying RF09 HFK, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Ka typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 17 years old, this Ford Ka is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of RF09 HFK?
You can check the full history of RF09 HFK by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was RF09 HFK registered?
RF09 HFK is a 2009 Ford Ka, first registered on 30 July 2009.
Is RF09 HFK safe to buy?
The MOT history for RF09 HFK shows 19 tests with a 78.9% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does RF09 HFK have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on RF09 HFK. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.