MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
93,772 miAbove average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Central exhaust rear flange corroded and weak
Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both, rear bushes (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Lower both suspension arm ball joint dust covers deteriorating
Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output both (4.1.4 (b))
Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened both (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Track rod end ball joint dust cover damaged or deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt both (2.1.3 (g) (i))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view chipped (3.2 (a) (i))
intermittent rattle/knock from engine/gearbox
Central exhaust rear flange corroded and weak
Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both, rear bushes (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Lower both suspension arm ball joint dust covers deteriorating
Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output both (4.1.4 (b))
Nearside Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Nearside Stop lamp(s) not working (4.3.1 (a) (ii))
Nearside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively split (3.4 (b) (ii))
Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened both (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Track rod end ball joint dust cover damaged or deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt both (2.1.3 (g) (i))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view chipped (3.2 (a) (i))
intermittent rattle/knock from engine/gearbox
Nearside Front Track rod end ball joint dust cover damaged or deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.1.3 (g) (i))
Nearside Rear Lower Position lamp light intensity obviously reduced (4.2.3 (a) (i))
rear flange on centre exhaust in poor condition
Rear Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (1.1.13 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Nearside Front Track rod end ball joint dust cover damaged or deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.1.3 (g) (i))
Nearside Rear Lower Position lamp light intensity obviously reduced (4.2.3 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Nail in tyre ()
rear flange on centre exhaust in poor condition
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened all (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Central exhaust rear flange heavily corroded and weak
Front Lower both bottom ball joint dust covers deteriorating
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin all (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Track rod end ball joint dust cover damaged or deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt both (2.1.3 (g) (i))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view chipped (3.2 (a) (i))
Central exhaust, rear flange heavily corroded and weak
Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated both (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both rear (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Track rod end ball joint dust cover damaged or deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt both (2.1.3 (g) (i))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view chipped (3.2 (a) (i))
Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge all 225/60/18 and perishing (5.2.3 (e))
exhaust system corroding
under trays fitted
Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing both 225/60/18 (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
exhaust system corroded
rear wiper blade split
under trays fitted
Rear wiperblade split
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view chipped (3.2 (a) (i))
exhaust centre section rear flange corroded & poor
exhaust system corroded
front brake pads wearing low and discs corroded and lipped
front lower arm bushes perished
front lower ball joint dust covers perished
stone chips in windscreen
suspension corroded
Offside Rear Stop lamp not working (1.2.1b)
exhaust system corroded
front brake pads wearing low and discs corroded and lipped
front lower arm bushes perished
front lower ball joint dust covers perished
stone chips in windscreen
suspension corroded
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 10mm circle within zone 'A' (8.3.1a)
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 40mm circle outside zone 'A' (8.3.1d)
exhaust system slightly corroded
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 10mm circle within zone 'A' (8.3.1a)
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 40mm circle outside zone 'A' (8.3.1d)
both front tyres have slight wear on inner edges
both front wiper blades are split
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 10mm circle within zone 'A' (8.3.1a)
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 40mm circle outside zone 'A' (8.3.1d)
both rear tyres are slightly perished
Rear registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
How Reliable is the Honda Cr-v?
Based on 4,177,643 MOT tests across 304,403 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
RF59 EFO is a 2010 Honda Cr-v in Red with a 1,997cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 16 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 81.3%.
Across all 2010 Honda Cr-v models, the average MOT pass rate is 82.9% with a typical mileage of 75,673 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Honda Cr-v fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 62,925 recorded failures. If you're considering buying RF59 EFO, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Honda Cr-v typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 16 years old, this Honda Cr-v is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of RF59 EFO?
You can check the full history of RF59 EFO by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was RF59 EFO registered?
RF59 EFO is a 2010 Honda Cr-v, first registered on 15 January 2010.
Is RF59 EFO safe to buy?
The MOT history for RF59 EFO shows 16 tests with a 81.3% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does RF59 EFO have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on RF59 EFO. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.