MOT Status
ValidMileage
143,225 miNot all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Brake pedal wearing smooth (1.1.2 (c))
Front Anti-roll bar pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Both sides - bushes perished (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened Both sides - corroded (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Exhaust mounting defective Broken (6.1.2 (a))
Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Both sides - rear bushes perished (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Headlamp lens slightly defective (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge worn on inner edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Axle corroded
Rear Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule Both sides (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Brake pedal wearing smooth (1.1.2 (c))
Front Anti-roll bar pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Both sides - bushes perished (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened Both sides - corroded (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Exhaust mounting defective Broken (6.1.2 (a))
Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Both sides - rear bushes perished (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Offside Front Headlamp lens slightly defective (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge worn on inner edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Axle corroded
Rear Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule Both sides (1.1.12 (f) (i))
How Reliable is the Peugeot 107 Urban?
Based on 13,123 MOT tests across 1,965 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
RJZ 9269 is a 2010 Peugeot 107 Urban in Red with a 998cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 12 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 75%.
The most common reason a Peugeot 107 Urban fails its MOT is windscreen has damage to an area in excess of a 10mm circle within zone 'a', accounting for 1 recorded failures. If you're considering buying RJZ 9269, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of RJZ 9269?
You can check the full history of RJZ 9269 by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was RJZ 9269 registered?
RJZ 9269 is a 2010 Peugeot 107 Urban, first registered on 29 October 2010.
Is RJZ 9269 safe to buy?
The MOT history for RJZ 9269 shows 12 tests with a 75% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does RJZ 9269 have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on RJZ 9269. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.