MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
32,902 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Offside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
front and rear supension corroded rusty
Front Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output headlamp lenses foggy (4.1.4 (b))
Front Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced subframe (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Front Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Nearside Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Offside Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Rear Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced subframe (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Offside Rear Seat belt anchorage prescribed area strength or continuity significantly reduced (7.1.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (7.1.1 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
all suspension parts have surface rust
Front Anti-roll bar corroded but not seriously weakened
Front Coil spring corroded Nearside & Offside (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output Nearside & offside (4.1.4 (b))
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened
Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened
Heavy corrosion to underside of vehicle not within 30cm of a structural mount
Rear Anti-roll bar corroded but not seriously weakened
Rear Coil spring corroded Nearside & Offside (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened
Offside Rear Service brake excessively binding Possible caliper seized (1.2.1 (f))
Front Anti-roll bar corroded but not seriously weakened
Front Coil spring corroded Nearside & Offside (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output Nearside & offside (4.1.4 (b))
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened
Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened
Heavy corrosion to underside of vehicle not within 30cm of a structural mount
Rear Anti-roll bar corroded but not seriously weakened
Rear Coil spring corroded Nearside & Offside (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened
Front Anti-roll bar corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened both (2.4.G.1)
Front coil spring corroded both (2.4.C.1b)
Rear Anti-roll bar corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened both (2.4.G.1)
Rear coil spring corroded both (2.4.C.1b)
heavy corrosion to underside of vehicle not within 30cm of a structural mount
Nearside Rear Mechanical brake component has restricted free movement (3.5.1k)
Front Anti-roll bar corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened both (2.4.G.1)
Front coil spring corroded both (2.4.C.1b)
Offside Front wheel starting to bind, little free movement
Parking brake lever has little reserve travel (3.1.6b)
Rear Anti-roll bar corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened both (2.4.G.1)
Rear coil spring corroded both (2.4.C.1b)
heavy corrosion to underside of vehicle not within 30cm of a structural mount
Headlamp deteriorated but light output not reduced both sides (1.7.5a)
multiple points of corrosion to underside, brake & suspension components
multiple points of corrosion to front & rear brake & suspension components and vehicle underside
Engine covers fitted obscuring some components in the engine bay
Front coil spring corroded (2.4.C.1b)
Rear coil spring corroded (2.4.C.1b)
Under-trays fitted obscuring some underside components
Anti-lock braking system warning lamp indicates an ABS fault (3.4.1c)
Engine covers fitted obscuring some components in the engine bay
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Front coil spring corroded (2.4.C.1b)
Rear coil spring corroded (2.4.C.1b)
Under-trays fitted obscuring some underside components
both offside front and offside rear brakes binding slightly
Parking brake lever has little reserve travel (3.1.6b)
all tyres perished due to age (2005)
both front and offside rear brakes binding
both nearside front and nearside rear tyres wearing close to legal limit
both rear outer sills have corrosion starting
genaral corrosion to suspension components
Nearside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Offside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
surface corrosion evident to both front lower suspension arms
surface corrosion evident to both rear outer sills
surface corrosion evident to both rear suspension arms
Offside rear brake juddering slightly (3.7.A.5b)
Offside Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
brake disc slightly pitted (3.5.1h)
How Reliable is the Mazda MX-5?
Based on 2,502,760 MOT tests across 160,823 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
RK02 LLA is a 2002 Mazda MX-5 in Blue with a 1,839cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 21 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 81%.
Across all 2002 Mazda MX-5 models, the average MOT pass rate is 75.1% with a typical mileage of 66,854 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Mazda MX-5 fails its MOT is seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded, accounting for 44,475 recorded failures. If you're considering buying RK02 LLA, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Mazda MX-5 typically stays on UK roads for around 36 years. At 24 years old, this Mazda MX-5 is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of RK02 LLA?
You can check the full history of RK02 LLA by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was RK02 LLA registered?
RK02 LLA is a 2002 Mazda MX-5, first registered on 30 March 2002.
Is RK02 LLA safe to buy?
The MOT history for RK02 LLA shows 21 tests with a 81% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does RK02 LLA have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on RK02 LLA. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.