MOT Status
ValidMileage
93,740 miAbove average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Exhaust box corroded
Front Coil spring corroded NS&OS (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Hydraulic leak, but not excessive rack (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened NS&OS & rear bushes splitting (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Strut towers (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Rear Tyre obviously under inflated Nail in tyre & perished (5.2.3 (l))
Rear Coil spring corroded NS&OS (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Shock absorbers has a reduced damping effect NS&OS (5.3.2 (d))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened Surrounding suspension components same condition (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Exhaust emissions likely to be affected by an exhaust leak injector chuffing (8.2.2.1 (b))
Front Inner Brake disc in such a condition that it is seriously weakened NS&OS (1.1.14 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Exhaust box corroded
Front Coil spring corroded NS&OS (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Hydraulic leak, but not excessive rack (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened NS&OS & rear bushes splitting (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Strut towers (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Rear Tyre obviously under inflated Nail in tyre & perished (5.2.3 (l))
Rear Coil spring corroded NS&OS (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Shock absorbers has a reduced damping effect NS&OS (5.3.2 (d))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened Surrounding suspension components same condition (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Coil spring corroded NS&OS (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Inner Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened NS&OS (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Lower Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened NS&OS (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Hydraulic leak, but not excessive Power Steering rack (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Coil spring corroded NS&OS (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Shock absorbers has a reduced damping effect NS&OS (5.3.2 (d))
Rear Sub-frame is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced And all surrounding suspension components, arms & anti roll bar (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
exhaust silencer corroded
Front Oil leak, but not excessive Engine (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Front Power steering component has slight seepage from a component Steering rack (2.1.5 (a))
Front Suspension component corroded but not seriously weakened All (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge NS & OS (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Coil spring corroded NS & OS (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Suspension component corroded but not seriously weakened All (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened all 4 (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Nearside Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Anti-roll bar linkage fractured (5.3.3 (b) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened all 4 (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Nearside Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Exhaust emissions test not completed because smoke levels are significantly in excess of the specified limit values (8.2.2.2 (f))
Nearside Front Steering rack gaiter missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt insecure (2.1.3 (g) (ii))
Offside Rear Stop lamp(s) not working (4.3.1 (a) (ii))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Windscreen washer not working front and rear (3.5 (a))
exhaust heat shield loose
nearside rear brake disc corroded on outer face
offside front brake disc corroded on inner face
offside rear brake disc corroded on inner face
How Reliable is the Ford C-max?
Based on 1,804,249 MOT tests across 138,182 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
RNZ 9601 is a 2009 Ford C-max in Silver with a 1,753cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 10 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 60%.
Across all 2009 Ford C-max models, the average MOT pass rate is 74.5% with a typical mileage of 67,542 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Ford C-max fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 25,824 recorded failures. If you're considering buying RNZ 9601, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford C-max typically stays on UK roads for around 20 years. At 17 years old, this Ford C-max is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of RNZ 9601?
You can check the full history of RNZ 9601 by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was RNZ 9601 registered?
RNZ 9601 is a 2009 Ford C-max, first registered on 3 March 2009.
Is RNZ 9601 safe to buy?
The MOT history for RNZ 9601 shows 10 tests with a 60% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does RNZ 9601 have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on RNZ 9601. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.