MOT Status
ValidMileage
70,959 miAbove average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened all corroded (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
handbrake slightly long
rear axle corroded
Offside Rear Wheel bearing rough when rotated (5.1.3 (b) (i))
Rear Registration plate inscription illegible (0.1 (b))
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened all corroded (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
handbrake slightly long
rear axle corroded
Suspension component corroded but not seriously weakened front and rea(springs, subframes, arms front subframe partially hidded by undertrays (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Suspension component corroded but not seriously weakened front and rea(springs, subframes, arms front subframe partially hidded by undertrays (5.3.3 (b) (i))
exhaust shields slightly deteriorated
suspension components corroded eg subframe, front arms, rear axle, rear springs
Nearside Rear Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (1.1.13 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Offside Rear Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (1.1.13 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Parking brake efficiency less than 50% of the required value (1.4.2 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Brake pad(s) wearing thin both front (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
exhaust shields slightly deteriorated
handbrake cables in poor condition
suspension components corroded eg subframe, front arms, rear axle, rear springs
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened slight corrosion, both (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
exhaust/heatshields slightly deteriorated
handbrake cables slightly deteriorated
suspension components slightly corroded eg subframe, front arms, rear coil springs etc
Nearside Rear Hydraulic brake calliper leaking (1.1.16 (b) (i))
Offside Front Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge both worn inner edges (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened slight corrosion, both (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
exhaust/heatshields slightly deteriorated
suspension components slightly corroded eg subframe, front arms, rear coil springs etc
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both inner surfaces (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Offside Rear Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Rear Coil spring corroded both (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
power steering light not illuminating
Engine MIL inoperative or indicates a malfunction (8.2.1.2 (h))
Offside Front Coil spring fractured or broken (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Headlamp aim too low (4.1.2 (a))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both inner surfaces (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Rear Coil spring corroded both (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
power steering light not illuminating
Bonnet primary retaining device slightly deteriorated Stiff. (3.1 (c))
Offside Front Inner Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge edge wearing more. (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Rear Both rear tyres showing signs of partial wear on inner edges.
Rear Exhaust rear silencer outer skin corroded.
EXHAUST SHIELD LOOSE
REAR TYRES PERISHING
Nearside Rear Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.5.1g)
Nearside Rear rear brakes release unevenly (3.7.B.4)
Nearside Rear rear brake binding (3.7.B.1) DANGEROUS
EXHAUST SHIELD LOOSE
REAR TYRES PERISHING
Rear Both rear tyres showing sign of perishing on outer wall.
Rear Outer casing of rear silencer slightly corroded but ok.
Front brake disc in such a condition that it is seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Rear Both rear tyres showing sign of perishing on outer wall.
Rear Outer casing of rear silencer slightly corroded but ok.
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened inner faces of discs are slightly corroded. (3.5.1i)
Nearside Front Headlamp not working on dipped beam (1.7.5a)
Under-trays fitted obscuring some underside components
Nail in offside rear tyre
Under-trays fitted obscuring some underside components
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Nail in offside rear tyre
Under-trays fitted obscuring some underside components
How Reliable is the Alfa Romeo Mito?
Based on 347,934 MOT tests across 25,785 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
RO59 JWP is a 2010 Alfa Romeo Mito in Blue with a 1,368cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 23 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 60.9%.
Across all 2010 Alfa Romeo Mito models, the average MOT pass rate is 73.4% with a typical mileage of 60,289 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Alfa Romeo Mito fails its MOT is coil spring broken, accounting for 6,763 recorded failures. If you're considering buying RO59 JWP, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Alfa Romeo Mito typically stays on UK roads for around 17 years. At 16 years old, this Alfa Romeo Mito is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of RO59 JWP?
You can check the full history of RO59 JWP by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was RO59 JWP registered?
RO59 JWP is a 2010 Alfa Romeo Mito, first registered on 12 February 2010.
Is RO59 JWP safe to buy?
The MOT history for RO59 JWP shows 23 tests with a 60.9% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does RO59 JWP have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on RO59 JWP. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.