MOT Status
ValidMileage
67,212 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (3.4 (b) (ii))
Offside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (3.4 (b) (ii))
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Direction indicator slightly discoloured (4.4.3 (a))
Nearside Side repeater slightly discoloured (4.4.3 (a))
Offside Front Inner Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
general under body rust
Offside Headlamp reflector slightly defective (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Brake pipe excessively corroded front to rear (1.1.11 (c))
Exhaust emissions exceed manufacturer's specified limit (8.2.2.2 (a))
Nearside Front Brake pipe excessively corroded (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Front Brake pipe excessively corroded (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Rear Direction indicator incorrect colour (4.4.3 (a))
Offside Side repeater incorrect colour (4.4.3 (a))
Rear Exhaust has a major leak of exhaust gases (6.1.2 (a))
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Side repeater slightly discoloured (4.4.3 (a))
Nearside Front Windscreen wiper blade defective (3.4 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Nearside Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Side repeater slightly discoloured (4.4.3 (a))
Offside Front Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Offside Front Headlamp lens slightly defective (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Windscreen wiper blade defective (3.4 (b) (i))
Offside Headlamp aim too high (4.1.2 (a))
Offside Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Rear Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
engine covers fitted obscuring some components in the engine bay
undertrays fitted obscuring some components under the vehicle
wheel covers fitted, wheel nuts not checked
Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded (1.1.11 (c))
Rear Sub-frame pin or bush likely to become detached (5.3.4 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Nearside Front Brake pipe slightly corroded into hose (3.6.B.2c)
Nearside Front Brake pipe slightly corroded to rear in clips (3.6.B.2c)
Offside Front Brake pipe slightly corroded into brake hose (3.6.B.2c)
Offside Front Brake pipe slightly corroded to rear in clips (3.6.B.2c)
Rear Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
Both rear tyres worn on the outer edges
Brake pipe slightly corroded Front to rear in clips (3.6.B.2c)
Engine cover and under tray fitted
Rear exhaust bac kbox 2nd skin corroded
Brake pipe slightly corroded front to rear slightly corroded in clips (3.6.B.2c)
engine covers fitted obscuring some components in the engine bay
nearside rear tyre wearing on outer edge
outer skin on rear exhaust slightly detriorated
under trays fitted obscuring some under side components
Both front tyres wearing on the inner and outer edges
Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Engine covers fitted obscuring some components in the engine bay
Nearside Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Nearside rear tyre wearing on the outer edge
Rear exhaust backbox 2nd skin corroded
Under-trays fitted obscuring some underside components
corrosion on brake pipes.
corrosion/leaks on exhaust.
oil level on minimum.
parking brake efficiency 17%.
Nearside Rear coil spring broken (2.4.C.1a)
Parking brake: parking brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.7)
corrosion on brake pipes.
corrosion/leaks on exhaust.
oil level on minimum.
Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
rear silencer deteriorated
Child seat fitted not allowing full inspection of adult belt
Nearside Rear Tyre has ply or cords exposed (4.1.D.1b)
Child seat fitted not allowing full inspection of adult belt
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
engine/underside covers fiotted
nsf/nsr tyres worn outer edges poor condition
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
rear tyres cracking
rear brake pads starting to get low
brake pads appear worn,advise wheel removal for further inspection.
nearside front tyre worn on edges to 2mm. and damage to sidewall.
nearside rear tyre worn on edge to 2mm. and damage to sidewall.
How Reliable is the Rover 75?
Based on 1,365,354 MOT tests across 103,127 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
RS52 CON is a 2003 Rover 75 in Gold with a 1,951cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 26 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 80.8%.
Across all 2003 Rover 75 models, the average MOT pass rate is 72.3% with a typical mileage of 68,100 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Rover 75 fails its MOT is brake pipe excessively corroded, accounting for 82,341 recorded failures. If you're considering buying RS52 CON, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Rover 75 typically stays on UK roads for around 27 years. At 23 years old, this Rover 75 is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of RS52 CON?
You can check the full history of RS52 CON by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was RS52 CON registered?
RS52 CON is a 2003 Rover 75, first registered on 8 January 2003.
Is RS52 CON safe to buy?
The MOT history for RS52 CON shows 26 tests with a 80.8% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does RS52 CON have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on RS52 CON. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.