MOT Status
ValidMileage
100,065 miAbove average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened rusty replace next set of pads (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both sides (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Coil spring corroded both sides (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Lower Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened under spring both sides (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened discs badly corroded (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Service brake fluctuating, but not excessively both sides possibly due to rusty discs (1.2.1 (e))
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement bushes perished and soft (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Coil spring corroded badly corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Lower Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened under spring (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement bushes perished and soft (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Coil spring corroded badly corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened under spring (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive engine under tray wet with oil (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
steering wheel cover removed prior to test slips on steering wheel
Nearside Rear Suspension arm pin or bush likely to become detached trailing arm front bush (5.3.4 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Offside Rear Suspension arm pin or bush likely to become detached trailing arm front bush (5.3.4 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened discs badly corroded (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Service brake fluctuating, but not excessively both sides possibly due to rusty discs (1.2.1 (e))
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement bushes perished and soft (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Coil spring corroded badly corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Lower Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened under spring (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement bushes perished and soft (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Coil spring corroded badly corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened under spring (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive engine under tray wet with oil (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
steering wheel cover removed prior to test slips on steering wheel
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened all four rusty (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Coil spring corroded both sides corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened surface rust inner face of discs (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Coil spring corroded both springs rusted (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Nearside Rear Tyre has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Offside Front Tyre has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Offside Rear Tyre has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure 215/50 R17 (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
advise aux drive belt
Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing All four tyres perished (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Nearside Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of a single lamp or all lamps (4.7.1 (b) (ii))
Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing All four tyres perished (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Nearside Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (4.7.1 (b) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Windscreen wiper blade defective Slightly smeary (3.4 (b) (i))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge Slightly worn inner edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge Slightly worn inner edge (5.2.3 (e))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Nearside Rear Direction indicator incorrect colour (4.4.3 (a))
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge Slightly worn inner edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Direction indicator incorrect colour (4.4.3 (a))
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge Slightly worn inner edge (5.2.3 (e))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear tyre wearing low.
Oil leak ()
stone chips in front screen.
Nearside Rear tyre wearing low.
Offside Front Headlamp aim beam image obviously incorrect (1.8.A.1b)
Oil leak ()
stone chips in front screen.
Engine covers fitted obscuring some components in the engine bay
How Reliable is the Ford Mondeo?
Based on 12,239,875 MOT tests across 1,205,291 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
RV12 YFS is a 2012 Ford Mondeo in Brown with a 1,560cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 17 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 70.6%.
Across all 2012 Ford Mondeo models, the average MOT pass rate is 77.5% with a typical mileage of 89,688 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Ford Mondeo fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 610,562 recorded failures. If you're considering buying RV12 YFS, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Mondeo typically stays on UK roads for around 33 years. At 14 years old, this Ford Mondeo is still in the earlier part of its expected life.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of RV12 YFS?
You can check the full history of RV12 YFS by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was RV12 YFS registered?
RV12 YFS is a 2012 Ford Mondeo, first registered on 29 March 2012.
Is RV12 YFS safe to buy?
The MOT history for RV12 YFS shows 17 tests with a 70.6% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does RV12 YFS have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on RV12 YFS. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.