MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
131,913 miAbove average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Upper Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively damaged significantly reducing structural strength (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Seat belt anchorage prescribed area strength or continuity significantly reduced sill inner sill and inner wheel arch (7.1.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Coil spring fractured or broken (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Lower Seat belt anchorage prescribed area strength or continuity significantly reduced sill inner sill and inner wheel arch (7.1.1 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Fuel Pipe/s corroded ()
Headlamp has a product on the light source but not seriously reducing light output 2 (4.1.4 (b))
Offside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Front Suspension spring mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (2.4.A.3)
Rear brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened 2 (3.5.1i)
sill covers
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar has excessive play in a pin/bush (2.4.G.2)
Front Suspension spring mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (2.4.A.3)
Rear brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened 2 (3.5.1i)
sill covers
Nearside Front Lower Front suspension has slight movement at a suspension ball joint (2.5.A.1c)
Nearside Rear Body or chassis has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of the body mountings (6.1.B.2)
Nearside Front Lower Front suspension has slight movement at a suspension ball joint (2.5.A.1c)
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm has slight play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
nearside inner sill corroded
rear air con pipes damp
unable to check full length of front to rear brake pipes due to fuel tank
unable to check full length of outer sills due to covers
Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.5.1g)
Offside Rear Inner Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded sill (2.4.A.3)
Offside front brake excessively fluctuating (3.7.B.3)
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm has slight play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
nearside inner sill corroded
rear air con pipes damp
unable to check full length of front to rear brake pipes due to fuel tank
unable to check full length of outer sills due to covers
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 10mm circle within zone 'A' (8.3.1a)
exhaust cat outter skin corroded
offside front tyre worn on both edges
unable to check full lenght of metel brake pipes due to fuel tank
Nearside Front Upper Suspension arm has excessive play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
Parking brake lever has no reserve travel (3.1.6b)
Parking brake: parking brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.7)
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 10mm circle within zone 'A' (8.3.1a)
exhaust cat outter skin corroded
offside front tyre worn on both edges
unable to check full lenght of metel brake pipes due to fuel tank
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 10mm circle within zone 'A' (8.3.1a)
exhaust centre section corroded and slight leak of gases
handbrake has slight travel
exhaust centre section corroded
offside front tyre slight wear on inner edge
offside rear tyre on 3mm
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
exhaust centre section corroded
front wheels require tracking
offside front tyre slight wear on inner edge
offside rear tyre on 3mm
Centre Exhaust has part of the system slightly deteriorated (7.1.1a)
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.2b)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.2b)
Child seat fitted not allowing full inspection of adult belt
Offside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Child seat fitted not allowing full inspection of adult belt
How Reliable is the Mitsubishi Estate?
Based on 1,035 MOT tests across 113 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
RV52 XBC is a 2002 Mitsubishi Estate in Silver with a 3,200cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 23 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 65.2%.
Across all 2002 Mitsubishi Estate models, the average MOT pass rate is 66.3% with a typical mileage of 110,372 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Mitsubishi Estate fails its MOT is brake pipe excessively corroded, accounting for 82 recorded failures. If you're considering buying RV52 XBC, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Mitsubishi Estate typically stays on UK roads for around 33 years. At 24 years old, this Mitsubishi Estate is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of RV52 XBC?
You can check the full history of RV52 XBC by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was RV52 XBC registered?
RV52 XBC is a 2002 Mitsubishi Estate, first registered on 5 September 2002.
Is RV52 XBC safe to buy?
The MOT history for RV52 XBC shows 23 tests with a 65.2% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does RV52 XBC have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on RV52 XBC. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.