MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
14,447 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Offside Front Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (1.1.2 (d))
Offside Rear Brake pedal is bent but brake can still be readily applied (1.1.2 (d))
Rear Drive chain worn but not considered excessive (6.1.7 (c) (i))
Rear Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced subframe (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced swing arm (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Central Rear Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced sub frame (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Central Rear Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced swing arm (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Offside Front Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (1.1.2 (d))
Front Motorcycle structure is fractured but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced plastics (6.1.1 (a) (i))
Offside Front Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (1.1.2 (d))
Rear Brake pedal is bent but brake can still be readily applied (1.1.2 (d))
Rear Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced sub frame (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced swingarm (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Front Tyre has a lump or bulge caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (5.2.3 (d) (i))
Rear Brake disc significantly and obviously worn (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Rear Brake excessively binding (1.2.1 (f))
Rear Brake grabbing severely (1.2.1 (c))
Rear Brake hose bulging under pressure (1.1.12 (d))
Rear Brake indicates excessive fluctuation of brake effort (1.2.1 (e))
Rear Engine mounting/bracket bracket damaged or deteriorated resulting in excessive movement crush drive rubbers (6.1.8 (a) (i))
Rear Road spring corroded so that its cross sectional area is reduced and seriously weakened (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Suspension component corroded and seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Motorcycle structure is fractured but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced plastics (6.1.1 (a) (i))
Offside Front Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (1.1.2 (d))
Rear Brake pedal is bent but brake can still be readily applied (1.1.2 (d))
Rear Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced sub frame (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced swingarm (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Front Brake disc(s) slightly pitted (3.2.A1l)
Front Brake hose slightly deteriorated (3.2.B3b)
Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (3.2.A1f(i))
Front Roller brake test indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (3.3.A1d)
Offside Front Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Rear Brake disc(s) slightly worn (3.2.A1l)
Rear Brake hose slightly deteriorated (3.2.B3b)
Rear Brake pedal is bent but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Rear Floor brake test indicates a slightly grabbing brake (3.3.C2d)
Rear Motorcycle structure slightly corroded swingarm (6.1.1a)
Rear Rear spring corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4A1b(ii))
Rear Roller brake test indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (3.3.A1d)
Front Brake hose slightly deteriorated (3.2.B3b)
Front Floor brake test indicates a slightly grabbing brake (3.3.C2d)
Nearside Front Motorcycle structure slightly damaged fiaring (6.1.1a)
Offside Front Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Outer Motorcycle structure slightly corroded frame (6.1.1a)
Rear Brake disc(s) has slight run out (3.2.A1m)
Rear Brake disc(s) is slightly distorted (3.2.A1m)
Rear Brake hose slightly deteriorated (3.2.B3b)
Rear Floor brake test indicates a slightly grabbing brake (3.3.C2d)
Rear Motorcycle structure slightly corroded swing arm (6.1.1a)
Rear Rear spring corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4A1b(ii))
Rear Rear suspension component slightly corroded. (2.4.A.1a)
Front Brake hose slightly deteriorated (3.2.B3b)
Front Floor brake test indicates a slightly grabbing brake (3.3.C2d)
Nearside Front Motorcycle structure slightly damaged fiaring (6.1.1a)
Offside Front Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Outer Motorcycle structure slightly corroded frame (6.1.1a)
Rear Brake disc(s) has slight run out (3.2.A1m)
Rear Brake disc(s) is slightly distorted (3.2.A1m)
Rear Brake hose slightly deteriorated (3.2.B3b)
Rear Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.2.A1f(i))
Rear Floor brake test indicates a slightly grabbing brake (3.3.C2d)
Rear Motorcycle structure slightly corroded swing arm (6.1.1a)
Rear Rear spring corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4A1b(ii))
Rear Rear suspension component slightly corroded. (2.4.A.1a)
Rear Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (4.1.3(ii))
Front Brake hose slightly deteriorated (3.2.B3b)
Front Roller brake test indicates a slightly grabbing brake (3.3.A1b)
Front Roller brake test indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (3.3.A1d)
Nearside Front Motorcycle structure slightly damaged (6.1.1a)
Offside Front Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Rear Brake hose slightly deteriorated (3.2.B3b)
Rear Exhaust mounting deteriorated. (7.1.1.c)
Rear Motorcycle structure slightly corroded (6.1.1a)
Rear Rear spring corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4A1b(ii))
Rear Rear suspension slightly corroded (2.4.A.2d)
Rear Roller brake test indicates a slightly grabbing brake (3.3.A1b)
Rear Roller brake test indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (3.3.A1d)
Front Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Rear Brake hose slightly deteriorated (3.2.B3b)
Rear Drive chain sprocket carrier worn but not considered excessive (6.2.1e)
Rear Roller brake test indicates a slightly grabbing brake (3.3.A1b)
Front Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Offside Front Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Nearside Exhaust is leaking but is not excessively noisey (7.1.1b)
Nearside Exhaust slightly deteriorated (7.1.1a)
Offside Exhaust is leaking but is not excessively noisey (7.1.1b)
Offside Exhaust slightly deteriorated (7.1.1a)
Offside Front Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Rear Motorcycle structure slightly corroded (6.1.1a)
Front Wheel alignment slightly misaligned. (2.5.1)
Nearside Front Exhaust is leaking but is not excessively noisey (7.1.1b)
Nearside Rear Exhaust is leaking but is not excessively noisey (7.1.1b)
rear monoshock stiff on bushes
Rear Motorcycle structure slightly corroded (6.1.1a)
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Offside Exhaust is leaking but is not excessively noisey (7.1.1b)
Brake pedal has inadequate reserve travel (3.1.3b)
Rear Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (4.1.3(ii))
Roller brake test The less effective brake control does not achieve an efficiency of 25%. (3.3.A2b)
Rear Brake fluid reservoir fluid level low (3.2.B1d)
Rear Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (3.2.A1f(i))
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
belly pan fouling side stand
How Reliable is the Kawasaki Ex 500-D5?
Based on 2,354 MOT tests across 240 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
S235 KEF is a 1998 Kawasaki Ex 500-D5 in Red with a 498cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 18 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 83.3%.
Across all 1998 Kawasaki Ex 500-D5 models, the average MOT pass rate is 80.8% with a typical mileage of 21,631 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Kawasaki Ex 500-D5 fails its MOT is roller brake test indicates a binding brake, accounting for 39 recorded failures. If you're considering buying S235 KEF, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Kawasaki Ex 500-D5 typically stays on UK roads for around 28 years. At 28 years old, this Kawasaki Ex 500-D5 is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of S235 KEF?
You can check the full history of S235 KEF by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was S235 KEF registered?
S235 KEF is a 1998 Kawasaki Ex 500-D5, first registered on 3 August 1998.
Is S235 KEF safe to buy?
The MOT history for S235 KEF shows 18 tests with a 83.3% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does S235 KEF have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on S235 KEF. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.