MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
147,067 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Nearside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Both NSF upper control arm inner bushes deteriorated (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Track rod end ball joint has slight play (2.1.3 (b) (i))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view 2x Stone chips to windscreen (3.2 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Nearside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Both NSF upper control arm inner bushes deteriorated (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Track rod end ball joint has slight play (2.1.3 (b) (i))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view 2x Stone chips to windscreen (3.2 (a) (i))
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread Front number plate cracked (0.1 (b))
Nearside Front Track rod end ball joint has slight play (2.1.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin NSR pads worn and disc shows evidence of continued bind (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Nearside Rear Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. NSR brake effort low in working ranges (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Nearside Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement NSF upper rear arm, inner bush deteriorated (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Inner Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view 2 stone chips to windscreen (OSF lower, NSF Central/Upper) (3.2 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords (5.2.3 (d) (i))
Offside Rear Coil spring fractured or broken (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread Front number plate cracked (0.1 (b))
Nearside Front Track rod end ball joint has slight play (2.1.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin NSR pads worn and disc shows evidence of continued bind (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Nearside Rear Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. NSR brake effort low in working ranges (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Nearside Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement NSF upper rear arm, inner bush deteriorated (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Inner Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view 2 stone chips to windscreen (OSF lower, NSF Central/Upper) (3.2 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge close to limits (5.2.3 (e))
Covers fitted within the engine bay at time of test are obscuring some components.
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge 3mm. (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Play in steering rack inner joint(s) Very slight. ()
Nearside Rear Child Seat fitted not allowing full inspection of adult belt ()
Offside Front Anti-roll bar linkage pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Bushes slightly deteriorated. (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge 2mm. (5.2.3 (e))
Under trays fitted to the vehicle at time of test are obscuring some components.
Fuel Tank Damp with Diesel Fuel. No Leak Visible at time of testing
Nearside Front Inner Road wheel slightly distorted Rim (5.2.2 (c) (i))
Nearside Front Track rod end ball joint has excessive play (2.1.3 (b) (i))
Fuel Tank Damp with Diesel Fuel. No Leak Visible at time of testing
Nearside Front Inner Road wheel slightly distorted Rim (5.2.2 (c) (i))
Rear exhaust silencer corroded
Nearside Front Upper Anti-roll bar linkage insecurely attached bolt missing (5.3.3 (a) (i))
Rear exhaust silencer corroded
Nearside Rear Nail in tyre ()
Nearside Rear brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Offside Rear brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
offside front tyre worn on edge
rear tyres cracked
rear brake discs corroded
Nearside Rear brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Offside Rear brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Engine covers fitted obscuring some components in the engine bay
Under-trays fitted obscuring some underside components
How Reliable is the Seat Exeo?
Based on 105,166 MOT tests across 8,155 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
S999 FFA is a 2010 Seat Exeo in Blue with a 1,968cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 17 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 76.5%.
Across all 2010 Seat Exeo models, the average MOT pass rate is 77.8% with a typical mileage of 100,099 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Seat Exeo fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 1,618 recorded failures. If you're considering buying S999 FFA, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Seat Exeo typically stays on UK roads for around 17 years. At 16 years old, this Seat Exeo is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of S999 FFA?
You can check the full history of S999 FFA by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was S999 FFA registered?
S999 FFA is a 2010 Seat Exeo, first registered on 24 March 2010.
Is S999 FFA safe to buy?
The MOT history for S999 FFA shows 17 tests with a 76.5% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does S999 FFA have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on S999 FFA. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.