MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
82,160 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement trailing arm bushes (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Front Suspension arm pin or bush excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Coil spring fractured or broken (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Headlamp not working on dipped beam (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Suspension arm ball joint excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of a single lamp or all lamps (4.7.1 (b) (ii))
Nearside Front Tyre has ply or cords exposed (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge edges (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced outer sill rusty (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Rear Inner Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Inner Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.3.6 (a) (i))
corrosion on underside of car hard to check cause covered
nearside rear shock damp
slight play in upper top mounts
underside of car covered
Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement rear bush (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit also worn smooth on inner edge (4.1.E.1)
Oil leak ()
Vehicle structure has slight corrosion (6.1.A.1)
Vehicle structure has slight corrosion rear inner and outer sills on nearside and offside (6.1.A.1)
exhaust system corroded worse around mounting points
fuel tank corroded
Nearside Front Headlamp aim not tested (1.8.A.1c)
Nearside Front Headlamp not working on dipped beam (1.7.5a)
Offside front brake excessively fluctuating (3.7.B.3)
Spare wheel carrier insecure (6.4.2)
Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (8.2.3)
Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement rear bush (2.4.G.2)
Nearside front brake fluctuating, but not excessively (3.7.B.3)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit also worn smooth on inner edge (4.1.E.1)
Oil leak ()
Vehicle structure has slight corrosion (6.1.A.1)
Vehicle structure has slight corrosion rear inner and outer sills on nearside and offside (6.1.A.1)
exhaust system corroded worse around mounting points
fuel tank corroded
unable to fully test wipers due to lack of fluid
Front Inner Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Front brake disc modified but not seriously weakened nearside/offside (3.5.1n)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit inner edge (4.1.E.1)
Rear Bonded suspension unit deteriorated but can function as intended nearside/offside axle bushes (2.4.F.3)
Rear Vehicle structure has slight corrosion nearside/offside inner/outer seals (6.1.B.2)
Rear nearside/offside tyre cracking in structure
Vehicle structure has slight corrosion (6.1.B.2)
exhaust system corroded
fuel tank corroded
Offside Front Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover excessively damaged so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated resulting in excessive movement front (2.4.G.2)
Front Inner Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Front brake disc modified but not seriously weakened nearside/offside (3.5.1n)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit inner edge (4.1.E.1)
Rear Bonded suspension unit deteriorated but can function as intended nearside/offside axle bushes (2.4.F.3)
Rear Vehicle structure has slight corrosion nearside/offside inner/outer seals (6.1.B.2)
Rear nearside/offside tyre cracking in structure
Vehicle structure has slight corrosion (6.1.B.2)
exhaust system corroded
fuel tank corroded
Offside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
beam axle bushes deteriorated to limit, requires attention
front brake discs corroded
front tyre valves age cracking
long travel in footbrake
rear inner and outer sills corroded
Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush bonding deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
beam axle bushes deteriorated to limit, requires attention
front brake discs corroded
front tyre valves age cracking
long travel in footbrake
rear inner and outer sills corroded
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
front brake discs worn
Nearside Headlamp aim too low (1.8)
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush bonding deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Headlamp aim too low (1.8)
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
front brake discs worn
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush bonding deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Offside Side repeater not working (1.4.A.2c)
How Reliable is the Ford Ka?
Based on 8,818,307 MOT tests across 675,715 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
SB58 JVG is a 2009 Ford Ka in Silver with a 1,299cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 18 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 61.1%.
Across all 2009 Ford Ka models, the average MOT pass rate is 75.5% with a typical mileage of 50,765 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Ford Ka fails its MOT is suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded, accounting for 404,005 recorded failures. If you're considering buying SB58 JVG, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Ka typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 17 years old, this Ford Ka is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of SB58 JVG?
You can check the full history of SB58 JVG by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was SB58 JVG registered?
SB58 JVG is a 2009 Ford Ka, first registered on 23 January 2009.
Is SB58 JVG safe to buy?
The MOT history for SB58 JVG shows 18 tests with a 61.1% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does SB58 JVG have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on SB58 JVG. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.