MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
152,018 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
O/s/sr tyre is deteriorated with cracks, date stamp of 2012
Oil leaks
Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement N/s/f lower arm rear bush, play is near MOT limit (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement O/s/f lower arm rear bush, play is near MOT limit (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Vehicle structure and suspension components are corroded but not excessively
Nearside Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Offside Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
O/s/sr tyre is deteriorated with cracks, date stamp of 2012
Oil leaks
Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement N/s/f lower arm rear bush, play is near MOT limit (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement O/s/f lower arm rear bush, play is near MOT limit (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Vehicle structure and suspension components are corroded but not excessively
N/s/f tyre worn smooth on inner edge, almost exposing cord
O/s/f tyre worn smooth on inner edge, almost exposing cord
All rear suspension bushes are deteriorated with both lower arm outer bushes having slight play
Engine and gearbox are damp with oil but not leaking
Front tyres worn on inner edges
Nearside Front Shock absorbers light misting of oil or has limited damping effect (5.3.2 (b))
O/s/f lower arm rear bush deteriorated with slightly play
Rear coil springs and suspension components are corroded but not excessively
Steering rack is damp, possible from other leaks
Nearside Headlamp aim too high (4.1.2 (a))
Nearside Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a))
Offside Headlamp aim too high (4.1.2 (a))
Offside Windscreen washer jets misaligned and not providing sufficient fluid to the windscreen (3.5 (a))
All rear suspension bushes are deteriorated with both lower arm outer bushes having slight play
Engine and gearbox are damp with oil but not leaking
Front tyres worn on inner edges
Nearside Front Shock absorbers light misting of oil or has limited damping effect (5.3.2 (b))
O/s/f lower arm rear bush deteriorated with slightly play
Rear coil springs and suspension components are corroded but not excessively
Steering rack is damp, possible from other leaks
Both wipers deteriorated, just met requirements
Rear brake discs worn
Rear suspension components corroded
Steering rack damp
Zone A windscreen damage
Nearside Headlamp aim beam image obviously incorrect No beam pattern (1.8.A.1b)
Offside Headlamp aim beam image obviously incorrect No beam pattern (1.8.A.1b)
Both wipers deteriorated, just met requirements
N/s/r tyre puncture near edge, not repairable
Rear brake discs worn
Rear suspension components corroded
Steering rack damp
Zone A windscreen damage
Both dip beam patterns just met requirements
Brake pedal rubber slightly worn
O/s/r tyre puncture
Both dip beam patterns just met requirements
Brake pedal rubber slightly worn
Nearside Headlamp aim beam image obviously incorrect (1.8.A.1b)
O/s/r tyre puncture
Offside Headlamp aim beam image obviously incorrect (1.8.A.1b)
Offside Front Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (2.7.3)
Power steering component(s) has slight seepage from a component (2.3.3b)
Nearside Headlamp aim beam image obviously incorrect (1.8.A.1b)
Nearside Rear Shock absorber has a serious fluid leak (2.7.3)
Offside Headlamp aim beam image obviously incorrect (1.8.A.1b)
Offside Stop lamp not working (1.2.1b)
Both front tyres badly worn on inner edges
Offside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Offside Front Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (2.7.3)
Power steering component(s) has slight seepage from a component (2.3.3b)
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
steering rack slightly damp
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Headlamp aim beam image obviously incorrect (1.8.A.1b)
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Headlamp aim beam image obviously incorrect (1.8.A.1b)
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Offside Front Front position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
Sterring rack slighty damp with fluid
Sterring rack slighty damp with fluid
n/s/f lower ball joint has light play
n/s/r tyre is wearing low on inner edge
o/s/r tyre is wearing low on inner edge
Offside Rear Shock absorber has a serious fluid leak (2.7.3)
N/s/r tyre perished on outer sidewall and out of shape
Wipers smeering slightly
Nearside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Nearside Front Front position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Headlamp aim too low (1.8)
Offside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Nearside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
How Reliable is the Ford Focus C-max?
Based on 1,326,487 MOT tests across 79,932 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
SC05 XFA is a 2005 Ford Focus C-max in Red with a 1,596cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 21 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 57.1%.
Across all 2005 Ford Focus C-max models, the average MOT pass rate is 73.0% with a typical mileage of 73,496 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Ford Focus C-max fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 67,238 recorded failures. If you're considering buying SC05 XFA, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Focus C-max typically stays on UK roads for around 23 years. At 21 years old, this Ford Focus C-max is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of SC05 XFA?
You can check the full history of SC05 XFA by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was SC05 XFA registered?
SC05 XFA is a 2005 Ford Focus C-max, first registered on 3 August 2005.
Is SC05 XFA safe to buy?
The MOT history for SC05 XFA shows 21 tests with a 57.1% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does SC05 XFA have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on SC05 XFA. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.