MOT Status
ValidMileage
105,725 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Obligatory mirror slightly damaged (3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Front Macpherson strut pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Battery in a weak state (not holding a charge).
Front Lower Anti-roll bar linkage pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement X2 both sides worn/deteriorated. (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Lower Oil seepage.
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Front Anti-roll bar pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement X2 both sides worn/deterioated. (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Sml oil seepage.
Nearside Rear wheel/brake assembly binding.
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Rear Wiper blade split/deterioated.
X4 tyres over 10 yrs old . 165/65/R14 79T
Front Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear wheel/brake assembly binding.
Rear Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. nsr binding. (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing X2 Tyres over 10 yrs old (2010) 165/65/R14 79T (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Rear Wiper blade split
Front sml oil & coolant seepage
Offside Front Upper Macpherson strut pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Top mount slight play. (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Rear wheels slightly binding.
Rear wiper blade split deteriorated.
Front Suspension arm pin or bush excessively worn x2 both sides wishbone back bushes deteriorated & split from bonding yellow chalk. (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin Inner pads lowest. (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Front sml oil & coolant seepage
Offside Front Upper Macpherson strut pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Top mount slight play. (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Rear wiper blade split deteriorated.
Nearside Front Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot severely deteriorated (6.1.7 (g) (i))
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Hand brake slight travel
Rear Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (6.1.2 (a))
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Parking brake lever has no reserve travel (3.1.6b)
Offside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
How Reliable is the Peugeot 107?
Based on 2,229,410 MOT tests across 139,779 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
SD59 LSZ is a 2010 Peugeot 107 in Yellow with a 998cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 18 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 83.3%.
Across all 2010 Peugeot 107 models, the average MOT pass rate is 78.3% with a typical mileage of 49,812 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Peugeot 107 fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 42,280 recorded failures. If you're considering buying SD59 LSZ, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Peugeot 107 typically stays on UK roads for around 21 years. At 16 years old, this Peugeot 107 is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of SD59 LSZ?
You can check the full history of SD59 LSZ by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was SD59 LSZ registered?
SD59 LSZ is a 2010 Peugeot 107, first registered on 21 January 2010.
Is SD59 LSZ safe to buy?
The MOT history for SD59 LSZ shows 18 tests with a 83.3% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does SD59 LSZ have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on SD59 LSZ. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.