MOT Status
ValidMileage
82,244 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
All outline marker lamps missing (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Nearside Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Nearside Headlamp aim too high and too far to the right. (4.1.2 (a))
Offside Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Offside Headlamp aim too high and too far to the right. (4.1.2 (a))
Offside Front Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
horsebox body corroded
Front Hydraulic leak, but not excessive steering rack area (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Offside Front Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
age related under body corrosion
Horn not working (7.7 (a))
Windscreen washer not working (3.5 (a))
Front Hydraulic leak, but not excessive steering rack area (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Offside Front Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
age related under body corrosion
Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material Front To Rear (1.1.11 (c))
Exhaust Heatshield Corrosion
Central exhaust outer skin slight corrosion
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Front Suspension component corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
corrosion to inner sills rear cross member and underside components
Front Brake hose ferrule excessively corroded nearside & offside (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Nearside Front Direction indicator not working (4.4.1 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Service brake excessively binding (1.2.1 (f))
Rear Brake hose ferrule excessively corroded nearside & offside (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Central exhaust outer skin slight corrosion
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Front Suspension component corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
corrosion to inner sills rear cross member and underside components
Corrosion to inner sills, rear cross member and underside components
Front Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Offside Rear Service brake fluctuating, but not excessively (1.2.1 (e))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Lower engine stabiliser/mounting deteriorated
Wipers deteriorated but clearing screen adequately
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength inner sill (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Parking brake efficiency below requirements (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Parking brake lever has excessive movement indicating incorrect adjustment Nearside parking brake low effort (1.1.6 (c))
Corrosion to inner sills, rear cross member and underside components
Front Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Offside Rear Service brake fluctuating, but not excessively (1.2.1 (e))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Lower engine stabiliser/mounting deteriorated
Wipers deteriorated but clearing screen adequately
Corrosion throughout front suspension
Corrosion to sills, rear cross member and underside
Front registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Parking brake limits only just met, nearside lower on effort in comparison to offside
Wipers deteriorated but clearing screen adequately
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint dust cover deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front suspension ball joint dust cover excessively deteriorated so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Nearside front brake binding (3.7.B.1)
Offside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Offside front brake binding (3.7.B.1)
Nearside Front suspension has slight play in a upper suspension ball joint (2.5.B.1a)
Nearside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7) DANGEROUS
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Front suspension has slight play in a upper suspension ball joint (2.5.B.1a)
Rear brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
rear pads getting low
Near side door mirror cover missing
Centre Stop lamp emits other than a steady red light (1.2.1e)
Nearside Rear Body has a sharp edge caused by damage (6.1.C.1)
Near side door mirror cover missing
Small cuts in nearside front tyre sidewall
nearside front door mirror cover missing
nearside front tyre wall cut (slight)
Nearside Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Offside Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Offside Rear position lamp(s) incorrect colour (1.1.A.3e)
nearside front door mirror cover missing
nearside front tyre wall cut (slight)
How Reliable is the Renault Master?
Based on 1,547,762 MOT tests across 123,092 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
SL57 XGU is a 2007 Renault Master in Blue with a 2,464cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 23 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 65.2%.
Across all 2007 Renault Master models, the average MOT pass rate is 70.2% with a typical mileage of 100,468 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Renault Master fails its MOT is parking brake: efficiency below requirements, accounting for 69,954 recorded failures. If you're considering buying SL57 XGU, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Renault Master typically stays on UK roads for around 31 years. At 19 years old, this Renault Master is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of SL57 XGU?
You can check the full history of SL57 XGU by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was SL57 XGU registered?
SL57 XGU is a 2007 Renault Master, first registered on 1 October 2007.
Is SL57 XGU safe to buy?
The MOT history for SL57 XGU shows 23 tests with a 65.2% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does SL57 XGU have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on SL57 XGU. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.