MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
90,366 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Anti-roll bar corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Rear Anti-roll bar corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Anti-lock braking system warning lamp indicates an ABS fault (1.6 (b))
Engine MIL inoperative or indicates a malfunction (8.2.1.2 (h))
Front Anti-roll bar corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Rear Anti-roll bar corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Nearside Rear Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear axel corroded
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both front (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement n/s/f (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge o/s/f inner edge (5.2.3 (e))
fuel flap hinge broken
Suspension arm pin or bush excessively worn o/s/f (5.3.4 (a) (i))
fuel flap hinge broken
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both front (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement n/s/f (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge o/s/f inner edge (5.2.3 (e))
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both front and both rear (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both front lower arms (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing n/s/r cracked on side walls (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Brakes imbalanced across an axle rear (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Road wheel fixing missing o/s/r bolt missing (5.2.1 (a) (i))
Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick rear (1.1.13 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both front and both rear (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Brake pad(s) wearing thin front (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Service brake binding but not excessively both rear (1.2.1 (f))
Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both front lower arms (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing n/s/r cracked on side walls (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Brake hose slightly deteriorated o/s/f (1.1.12 (b) (ii))
Brake hose slightly twisted n/s/f (1.1.12 (b) (i))
Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. rear (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Coil spring corroded both rear and n/s/f (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nail in tyre o/s/r ()
Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both front lower arms (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge n/s/r (5.2.3 (e))
Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm n/s/f (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Brake hose slightly deteriorated o/s/f (1.1.12 (b) (ii))
Brake hose slightly twisted n/s/f (1.1.12 (b) (i))
Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. rear (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Coil spring corroded both rear and n/s/f (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Headlamp aim so that beam "kick up" is not visible on the screen n/s (4.1.2 (a))
Nail in tyre o/s/r ()
Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both front lower arms (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge n/s/r (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Front Lower Brake hose slightly deteriorated (3.6.B.4d)
Nearside Rear Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement Both front & rear bushes (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit Casing showing cracking (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement Both front & rear bushes (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Nail in tyre ()
Offside Rear Outer Rear position lamp(s) damaged, but still visible from a reasonable distance (1.1.A.3d)
Parking brake lever has little reserve travel (3.1.6b)
Anti-roll bar linkage has slight play in a ball joint o/s/f (2.4.G.2)
Brake hose slightly deteriorated both front (3.6.B.4d)
Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. front (3.7.B.5b)
Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement both front (2.4.G.2)
coil spring corroded n/s/f and o/s/r (2.4.C.1b)
windscreen marked
Front position lamp(s) not working n/s/f (1.1.A.3b)
Anti-roll bar linkage has slight play in a ball joint o/s/f (2.4.G.2)
Brake hose slightly deteriorated both front (3.6.B.4d)
Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. front (3.7.B.5b)
Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement both front (2.4.G.2)
coil spring corroded n/s/f and o/s/r (2.4.C.1b)
windscreen marked
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Front position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
How Reliable is the Volvo S80?
Based on 422,980 MOT tests across 31,257 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
SM53 WGJ is a 2003 Volvo S80 in Green with a 1,984cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 23 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 73.9%.
Across all 2003 Volvo S80 models, the average MOT pass rate is 72.0% with a typical mileage of 96,140 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Volvo S80 fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 16,357 recorded failures. If you're considering buying SM53 WGJ, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Volvo S80 typically stays on UK roads for around 28 years. At 23 years old, this Volvo S80 is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of SM53 WGJ?
You can check the full history of SM53 WGJ by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was SM53 WGJ registered?
SM53 WGJ is a 2003 Volvo S80, first registered on 27 November 2003.
Is SM53 WGJ safe to buy?
The MOT history for SM53 WGJ shows 23 tests with a 73.9% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does SM53 WGJ have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on SM53 WGJ. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.