MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
125,170 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material swollen under plastic coating (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Rear Nail in tyre ()
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Coil spring corroded both sides (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Shock absorbers has slight external damage to the casing corrosion both sides (5.3.2 (b))
Nearside Front Coil spring fractured or broken (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Driver's seat fore and aft adjustment mechanism not functioning as intended. (6.2.5 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Nearside Rear Parking brake inoperative on one side (1.4.1 (a))
Offside Front Coil spring fractured or broken (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Driver's seat fore and aft adjustment mechanism not functioning as intended. (6.2.5 (b) (i))
Offside Front Headlamp not working on dipped beam (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Parking brake efficiency below requirements (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Parking brake lever has excessive movement indicating incorrect adjustment (1.1.6 (c))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Rear Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (4.7.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material swollen under plastic coating (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Rear Nail in tyre ()
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Coil spring corroded both sides (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Shock absorbers has slight external damage to the casing corrosion both sides (5.3.2 (b))
Side repeater slightly discoloured both sides (4.4.3 (a))
could not test rear seat belts due to front seats not operating as intended
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Body component corroded and likely to cause injury Wheel arch (6.2.1 (a) (i))
Parking brake lever has excessive movement indicating incorrect adjustment (1.1.6 (c))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material various corroding under coating (1.1.11 (c))
Central Stop lamp(s) non-obligatory stop lamp not working (4.3.1 (a) (ii))
Coil spring corroded all (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened both (5.3.3 (b) (i))
front subframe, rear axle corroded
suspension components slightly corroded eg front arms, subframe
various brake pipes corroded under coating
Nearside Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect height motor not tested (4.1.2 (c))
Rear Exhaust has a major leak of exhaust gases (6.1.2 (a))
Offside Front Tyre has a bulge, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Nearside Front tyre worn on edges
suspension components slightly corroded eg front arms, subframe
various brake pipes corroded under coating
exhaust corroded
service overdue
slight buckles in n/s/f and o/s/r wheels
slight gearbox oil leak
suspension components corroding eg rear springs, both front lower arms and rear axle
underside brake pipes have corrosion under paint
Headlamp aim not tested level device also not tested (4.1.2 (b))
Nearside Coil spring fractured or broken (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Headlamp not working on dipped beam (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Coil spring fractured or broken (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Headlamp not working on dipped beam (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Headlamp not working on main beam (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
exhaust corroded
o/s/f headlamp damp and connection corroded
o/s/f wheel arch cover missing
slight buckles in n/s/f and o/s/r wheels
slight gearbox oil leak
suspension components corroding eg rear springs, both front lower arms and rear axle
underside brake pipes have corrosion under paint
heatshield at manifold slightly insecure at top
slight corrosion on suspension components eg springs, arms etc
slight gearbox oil leak
Parking brake efficiency below requirements (1.4.2 (a) (i))
handbrake cables deteriorated
heatshield at manifold slightly insecure at top
slight corrosion on suspension components eg springs, arms etc
slight gearbox oil leak
Nearside Front wheel slightly buckled
Offside hand brake effort low
all coil springs rusty
both rear tyres uneven wear in tread and cracking sidewalls and getting near wear limit
front and rear brake discs very slight wear
hand brake feels slightly stiff
rear exhaust heat shield loose
slight exhaust blow front exhaust joint
slight movement drivers seat
exhaust corroded
n/s/f seat not tilting
slight oil leaks from gearbox and engine
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover excessively deteriorated so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
both front strut bearings seizing
exhaust corroded
n/s/f seat not tilting
slight oil leaks from gearbox and engine
parking brake only just met minimum requirements
How Reliable is the Alfa Romeo Mito?
Based on 347,934 MOT tests across 25,785 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
SM59 WGF is a 2009 Alfa Romeo Mito in Black with a 1,368cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 16 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 62.5%.
Across all 2009 Alfa Romeo Mito models, the average MOT pass rate is 71.8% with a typical mileage of 63,000 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Alfa Romeo Mito fails its MOT is coil spring broken, accounting for 6,763 recorded failures. If you're considering buying SM59 WGF, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Alfa Romeo Mito typically stays on UK roads for around 17 years. At 17 years old, this Alfa Romeo Mito is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of SM59 WGF?
You can check the full history of SM59 WGF by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was SM59 WGF registered?
SM59 WGF is a 2009 Alfa Romeo Mito, first registered on 31 December 2009.
Is SM59 WGF safe to buy?
The MOT history for SM59 WGF shows 16 tests with a 62.5% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does SM59 WGF have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on SM59 WGF. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.