MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
52,936 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Brake disc significantly and obviously worn both sides (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Front Service brake excessively fluctuating both sides (1.2.1 (e))
Nearside Front Inner Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength sill (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Outer Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength sill (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Inner Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength sill (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Outer Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength sill (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Front Inner Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength sill (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Front Outer Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength sill (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Parking brake inoperative on one side (1.4.1 (a))
Parking brake efficiency below requirements (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure cracked through to chords (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Offside Front Tyre has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure cracked through to chords (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Nearside Outer Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive centre sll (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Outer Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive centre sill (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin both sides (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Front Lower Sub-frame is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced which is partly covered by fitted undertray (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened on inner face (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Nearside Front Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced floor to sill area (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Nearside Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Lower Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush (5.3.2 (c))
Nearside Rear Outer Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Nearside Rear Shock absorbers has light misting of oil (5.3.2 (b))
Nearside Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened both upper and lower (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened on inner face (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Offside Front Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced floor to sill area (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Offside Front Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Offside Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Lower Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush (5.3.2 (c))
Offside Rear Outer Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Offside Rear Shock absorbers has light misting of oil (5.3.2 (b))
Offside Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened both upper and lower (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Upper Sub-frame is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Upper Sub-frame is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
all ferrous rear suspension components corroded
exhaust emissions to clean to record
outer sill covers fitted making corrosion inspection difficult
suspect engine noise at low rpm may be dual mass fly wheel
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both on inner brake face (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Lower Sub-frame is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced which is also covered in part by undertray (6.1.1 (c) (i))
NB suspect noise from engine is the dual mass assembly
Nearside Front floor area corroded and undersealed
Nearside Rear Lower Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush (5.3.2 (c))
Offside Front floor area corroded and undersealed
Rear Shock absorbers has light misting of oil both (5.3.2 (b))
Rear Upper Sub-frame is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
all rear ferrous suspension parts corroded
exhaust emissions to clean to record
outer sill covers fitted making corrosion check difficult
Rear Coil spring corroded both (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Shock absorbers has a reduced damping effect both (5.3.2 (d))
all ferrous parts of rear suspension corroded
outer sill covers fitted making sill inspection difficult
slight corrosion on both sides of the floor to sills
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Outer sill covers fitted making corrosion inspection difficult
Rear Shock absorbers has a reduced damping effect both (5.3.2 (d))
both front and rear suspension components corroded not excessive
dsm cant detect any smoke
slight corrosion on both sides of floor outwith prescribed area
Nearside Brake pipe excessively corroded front to rear along the floor (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Brake pipe excessively corroded front to rear along the floor (1.1.11 (c))
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Outer sill covers fitted making corrosion inspection difficult
Rear Shock absorbers has a reduced damping effect both (5.3.2 (d))
both front and rear suspension components corroded not excessive
dsm cant detect any smoke
slight corrosion on both sides of floor outwith prescribed area
Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material both front to rear along the floor (1.1.11 (c))
both front and rear suspension components corroded but not excessive
sill covers fitted making corrosion inspection difficult
brake pipes along floor corroded but not excessive
various front and rear suspension components corroded but not excessive
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Offside Front Tyre has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
brake pipes along floor corroded but not excessive
various front and rear suspension components corroded but not excessive
both front to rear brake pipes slightly corroded
sill covers fitted making corrosion assessment difficult
Brake pipe slightly corroded x2 front to rear (3.6.B.2c)
How Reliable is the Jaguar X-type?
Based on 1,912,556 MOT tests across 119,397 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
ST54 CMO is a 2004 Jaguar X-type in Silver with a 1,988cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 22 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 86.4%.
Across all 2004 Jaguar X-type models, the average MOT pass rate is 72.1% with a typical mileage of 85,546 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Jaguar X-type fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 68,260 recorded failures. If you're considering buying ST54 CMO, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Jaguar X-type typically stays on UK roads for around 25 years. At 22 years old, this Jaguar X-type is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of ST54 CMO?
You can check the full history of ST54 CMO by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was ST54 CMO registered?
ST54 CMO is a 2004 Jaguar X-type, first registered on 29 September 2004.
Is ST54 CMO safe to buy?
The MOT history for ST54 CMO shows 22 tests with a 86.4% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does ST54 CMO have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on ST54 CMO. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.