MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
56,028 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Front Brake hose excessively deteriorated Rubber cracked open (1.1.12 (b) (ii))
Nearside Front Headlamp light intensity severely reduced (4.1.4 (a))
Offside Front Brake hose excessively deteriorated Cracked rubber (1.1.12 (b) (ii))
Offside Front Headlamp light intensity severely reduced no beam kick evident on both headlamps (4.1.4 (a))
Offside Front Power steering pipe/hose leaking Heavily corroded & leaking (2.1.5 (a))
Offside Front Track rod end ball joint has excessive play (2.1.3 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded (1.1.11 (c))
Driver's view Items removed from driver's view prior to test (3.1 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Nearside Front Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Nearside Rear Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Nearside Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Rear Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Nearside Front Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Offside Front Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Offside Front Inner Brake disc significantly and obviously worn (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Corrosion in various places and on various components.
Front brake pads look low.
Headlamp lenses are discolouring.
Metal brake pipes going to rear hoses are corroding.
N/s front footbrake works a little slower than o/s.
N/s handbrake effort is not as good as o/s.
N/s rear footbrake works a little slower than o/s.
O/s front brake is binding slightly.
O/s front tyre is perishing in the tread.
Rear brake pads look low.
Rear number plate is discolouring.
Slight play in n/s front anti roll bar link.
Both o/s brakes are binding slightly.
Extensive corrosion in various places & on various components.
Front brake pads look low.
Metal brake pipes going to both rear hoses are corroding.
Rear number plate is discolouring.
Brake pad(s) wearing thin both front inner (3.5.1g)
Rear registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
both headlamp lenses dull
exhaust front pipe hanger broken
Offside rear brake excessively fluctuating (3.7.B.3)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Brake pad(s) wearing thin both front inner (3.5.1g)
Brake pad(s) wearing thin both rear (3.5.1g)
Rear registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
both headlamp lenses dull
brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both rear (3.5.1i)
exhaust front pipe hanger broken
BOTH FRONT TYRES WORN ON EDGES
BOTH FRONT WIPER BLADES IN POOR CONDITION
HANDBRAKE EFFICIENCY 16%. JUST PASSED
Headlamp deteriorated but light output not reduced BOTH (1.7.5a)
Power steering fluid level low, but not below minimum (2.3.1)
registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread REAR (6.3.1d)
Headlamp deteriorated but light output not reduced (1.7.5a)
Rear registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
light surface scratching to windscreen
Offside Rear coil spring broken (2.4.C.1a)
Headlamp deteriorated but light output not reduced (1.7.5a)
Rear registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
light surface scratching to windscreen
rear back-box joint slightly corroded
Rear registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Nearside Rear coil spring fractured (2.4.C.1a)
Rear registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Child seat fitted not allowing full inspection of adult belt
Rear registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
both front tyres slightly worn on egdes
Centre Exhaust has part of the system slightly deteriorated (7.1.1a)
Nearside Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Nearside Outer Front Anti-roll bar linkage has slight play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Offside Outer Front Anti-roll bar linkage has slight play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
Rear brake disc excessively pitted (3.5.1h)
Rear brake disc excessively scored (3.5.1h)
Nearside Rear brake disc slightly scored (3.5.1h)
Offside Rear brake disc slightly scored (3.5.1h)
How Reliable is the Nissan Almera?
Based on 2,976,239 MOT tests across 231,560 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
SV55 OHL is a 2005 Nissan Almera in Silver with a 1,769cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 18 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 66.7%.
Across all 2005 Nissan Almera models, the average MOT pass rate is 73.7% with a typical mileage of 58,958 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Nissan Almera fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 141,538 recorded failures. If you're considering buying SV55 OHL, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Nissan Almera typically stays on UK roads for around 30 years. At 21 years old, this Nissan Almera is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of SV55 OHL?
You can check the full history of SV55 OHL by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was SV55 OHL registered?
SV55 OHL is a 2005 Nissan Almera, first registered on 25 October 2005.
Is SV55 OHL safe to buy?
The MOT history for SV55 OHL shows 18 tests with a 66.7% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does SV55 OHL have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on SV55 OHL. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.