MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
61,435 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material Multiple pipes covered in grease preventing full inspection. (1.1.11 (c))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened Inner face corroded. (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing Both front tyres perishing on outer sidewall. (195/70 R15) (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Front Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced At rear of both front arches, small holes appeared due to corrosion. (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material At brake cylinder. (1.1.11 (c))
Front Anti-roll bar pin or bush excessively worn All 4 bushes for anti-roll bar worn. (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material Multiple pipes covered in grease preventing full inspection. (1.1.11 (c))
Coolant leak Coolant level low, evidence of leak at front of engine. ()
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened Inner face corroded. (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Oil leak, but not excessive Around engine oil sump. (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Front Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing Both front tyres perishing on outer sidewall. (195/70 R15) (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Front Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced At rear of both front arches, small holes appeared due to corrosion. (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material At brake cylinder. (1.1.11 (c))
Central Front Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Front Anti-roll bar pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Outer anti-roll bar bushes near the end of anti-roll bar worn. (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Both front top arm ball joint covers look burst as there is a lot of grease around them, but not clear enough to see if they are okay. Needs cleaned and inspected.
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened Front discs corroded on inner edge. (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule All front ferrules corroded. (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Front Couple chips on windscreen, not affecting drivers view.
Front Outer Outer lights for indicators, both front have a cracked lens. No effect on emitted light.
Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge Both front tyres quite badly worn on edges, advise fix. (195/70 R15C 104O) (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Nearside Rear Wheel bearing has slight play (5.1.3 (a) (i))
Rear Exhaust mounting defective Mounting towards the rear has broken, exhaust still secure. (6.1.2 (a))
Underside of vehicle covered in underseal preventing full inspection of components and the body.
Battery support tray corroded
Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material Mostly all brake pipes greased (1.1.11 (c))
Front Upper Suspension arm ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated Both (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced General underside corrosion (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Service brake fluctuating, but not excessively Both (1.2.1 (e))
Vehicles internal headlight adjuster altered to recheck lights ()
Nearside Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a))
Vehicles internal headlight adjuster altered to recheck lights ()
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement On lower arm (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Anti-roll bar rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement On lower arm (2.4.G.2)
Rear body holed at o/s & n/s rear
Front Brakes imbalanced across an axle 44% (3.7.B.5b)
Offside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Offside Stop lamp not working (1.2.1b)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Anti-roll bar rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
n/s door mirror missing
Fuel cap/sealing device does not fasten securely maintaining the sealing arrangement (7.2.4b)
Offside Stop lamp not working (1.2.1b)
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Anti-roll bar rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
n/s door mirror missing
How Reliable is the Toyota Dyna?
Based on 55,890 MOT tests across 3,653 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
SW58 OKM is a 2009 Toyota Dyna in White with a 2,982cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 17 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 76.5%.
Across all 2009 Toyota Dyna models, the average MOT pass rate is 70.3% with a typical mileage of 74,142 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Toyota Dyna fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 1,652 recorded failures. If you're considering buying SW58 OKM, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Toyota Dyna typically stays on UK roads for around 25 years. At 17 years old, this Toyota Dyna is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of SW58 OKM?
You can check the full history of SW58 OKM by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was SW58 OKM registered?
SW58 OKM is a 2009 Toyota Dyna, first registered on 29 January 2009.
Is SW58 OKM safe to buy?
The MOT history for SW58 OKM shows 17 tests with a 76.5% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does SW58 OKM have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on SW58 OKM. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.