MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
12,408 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Cooling fan has no safety cover
Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (6.1.2 (a))
Front Suspension no movement
Main stand fouling on exhaust
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit 1.6 mm- 2.0 mm (5.2.3 (e))
Rear slight loss of rear damping
Nearside Rear Footrest missing (6.2.12 (a))
Offside Rear Footrest missing (6.2.12 (a))
Rear Shock absorber has negligible damping effect (5.3.2 (b))
Cooling fan has no safety cover
Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (6.1.2 (a))
Front Suspension no movement
Main stand fouling on exhaust
Rear Carrier insecure
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit 1.6 mm- 2.0 mm (5.2.3 (e))
Central Front Headlamp light source and lamp not compatible led bulb fitted, no beam found, or difference between dip or main beam. (4.1.4 (c))
Nearside Brake lever has insufficient reserve travel rear brake lever insufficient reserve travel. (1.1.2 (a))
Nearside Front Brake disc contaminated grease on disc and brake pad (1.1.14 (b))
Offside Front Shock absorber insecurely attached r/h front shock top mounting securing nylock nut not reaching thread. (5.3.2 (a) (i))
Rear Direction indicator incorrect colour both rear turn signals no real amber colour found, mainly white light (4.4.3 (a))
Rear Shock absorber has negligible damping effect no damping found in suspension (5.3.2 (b))
Front Suspension component modified so the suspension is inoperative not possible to compress front suspension (5.3.3 (c) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Rear rear mudguard not secured on rh rear, possiblility of fouling the tyre.
Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Front Wheel has a slightly distorted bead rim (5.2.2 (c) (i))
Lower Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Lower Suspension pin, bush or joint worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Lower Suspension pin, bush or joint worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Upper Shock absorber has a slightly worn bush (5.3.2 (c))
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Lower Suspension pin, bush or joint worn but not resulting in excessive movement borederline (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit just 1mm (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Upper Suspension pin, bush or joint worn but not resulting in excessive movement shock (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (5.2.3 (e))
Headlamp not working on dipped beam (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Headlamp not working on main beam (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Rear Lower Suspension pin, bush or joint worn but not resulting in excessive movement borederline (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit just 1mm (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Upper Suspension pin, bush or joint worn but not resulting in excessive movement shock (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Exhaust slightly deteriorated (7.1.1a)
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Lower Motorcycle structure slightly corroded (6.1.1a)
Upper Rear suspension bush has slight free play shock (2.4.A2a(i))
Headlamp at least one does not illuminate on dipped beam (1.2.2a(i))
Exhaust is leaking but is not excessively noisey (7.1.1b)
Exhaust slightly deteriorated (7.1.1a)
Front Brake component worn but not seriously reduced in strength caliper linkage bushes borderline (3.2.A1)
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Lower Motorcycle structure slightly corroded (6.1.1a)
Upper Rear suspension bush has slight free play shock (2.4.A2a(i))
Exhaust slightly deteriorated (7.1.1a)
Front Brake component worn but not seriously reduced in strength torque arm (3.2.A1)
Front Brake disc(s) slightly worn (3.2.A1l)
Front tyre has strange wear?
Lower Motorcycle structure slightly corroded (6.1.1a)
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
Front Brake disc(s) slightly worn (3.2.A1l)
Front Lower Brake component worn but not seriously reduced in strength borderline (3.2.A1)
Lower Motorcycle structure slightly corroded (6.1.1a)
Upper Rear suspension bush has slight free play shock (2.4.A2a(i))
Exhaust excessively deteriorated (7.1.1a)
Exhaust is leaking and excessively noisey (7.1.1b)
Headlamp at least one does not illuminate on dipped beam (1.2.2a(i))
Headlamp at least one does not illuminate on main beam (1.2.2a(ii))
Front Brake disc(s) slightly worn (3.2.A1l)
Front Lower Brake component worn but not seriously reduced in strength borderline (3.2.A1)
Lower Motorcycle structure slightly corroded (6.1.1a)
Upper Rear suspension bush has slight free play shock (2.4.A2a(i))
headlight aim not tested
How Reliable is the Lexmoto Zn 125 T-k?
Based on 1,263 MOT tests across 300 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
SY62 ANP is a 2012 Lexmoto Zn 125 T-k in White with a 124cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 12 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 58.3%.
Across all 2012 Lexmoto Zn 125 T-k models, the average MOT pass rate is 72.6% with a typical mileage of 4,150 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Lexmoto Zn 125 T-k fails its MOT is brake lever has inadequate reserve travel, accounting for 40 recorded failures. If you're considering buying SY62 ANP, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Lexmoto Zn 125 T-k typically stays on UK roads for around 15 years. At 14 years old, this Lexmoto Zn 125 T-k is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of SY62 ANP?
You can check the full history of SY62 ANP by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was SY62 ANP registered?
SY62 ANP is a 2012 Lexmoto Zn 125 T-k, first registered on 1 September 2012.
Is SY62 ANP safe to buy?
The MOT history for SY62 ANP shows 12 tests with a 58.3% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does SY62 ANP have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on SY62 ANP. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.