MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
118,768 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
both rear shox heavily corroded
chassis underside heavily corroded
Rear shockers heavily corroded
underside heavily corroded all around all suspension and chassis
Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (3.4 (b) (ii))
Nearside Front Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Nearside Rear Seat belt anchorage prescribed area strength or continuity significantly reduced outer sill (7.1.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength around leaf spring mount (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Front Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Offside Rear Seat belt anchorage prescribed area strength or continuity significantly reduced outer sill (7.1.1 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Service brake effort inadequate at a wheel (1.2.1 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength around rear spring hanger (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Parking brake efficiency below requirements (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Rear Brakes imbalanced across an axle Axle 2 (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Rear shockers heavily corroded
underside heavily corroded all around all suspension and chassis
Front suspension components corroded
Nearside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear suspension components corroded
Front Registration plate incorrect (0.1 (c))
Nearside Front Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect Bulb incorrectley fitted (4.1.2 (c))
Nearside Rear Leaf spring fractured (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Leaf spring fractured (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Parking brake efficiency below requirements (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Rear Brakes imbalanced across an axle Axle 2 (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Rear Registration plate incorrect (0.1 (c))
Service brake efficiency below requirements (1.2.2 (a) (i))
Nearside Brake pipe at imminent risk of failure or fracture From ABS pump to mid joint (1.1.11 (a)) DANGEROUS
Offside Brake pipe at imminent risk of failure or fracture From ABS pump to mid joint (1.1.11 (a)) DANGEROUS
Brake performance not tested Nail in tyre,would cause damage to brake rollers. (1.2.1 (g))
Slight oil leak on front diff and extension tube
n/s/r spring leaf slightly out of line
slight corrosion to front brake disc inner faces
Nearside Front Brake pipe excessively corroded x2 (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Rear Service brake excessively binding (1.2.1 (f))
Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded 2xabove and across rear axle (1.1.11 (c))
Trailer electrical socket (13 pin) not operating the trailer lamps as intended (4.10 (c) (i))
Slight oil leak on front diff and extension tube
n/s/r spring leaf slightly out of line
slight corrosion to front brake disc inner faces
Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material all brake pipes (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
How Reliable is the Ford Ranger?
Based on 1,687,380 MOT tests across 189,558 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
SY62 WUL is a 2012 Ford Ranger in Orange with a 3,198cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 16 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 75%.
Across all 2012 Ford Ranger models, the average MOT pass rate is 75.7% with a typical mileage of 79,392 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Ford Ranger fails its MOT is brake pipe excessively corroded, accounting for 41,033 recorded failures. If you're considering buying SY62 WUL, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Ranger typically stays on UK roads for around 27 years. At 14 years old, this Ford Ranger is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of SY62 WUL?
You can check the full history of SY62 WUL by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was SY62 WUL registered?
SY62 WUL is a 2012 Ford Ranger, first registered on 13 December 2012.
Is SY62 WUL safe to buy?
The MOT history for SY62 WUL shows 16 tests with a 75% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does SY62 WUL have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on SY62 WUL. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.