MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
126,205 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement rear bush (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Headlamp deteriorated but light output not reduced (1.7.5a)
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement rear bush (2.4.G.2)
Offside Headlamp deteriorated but light output not reduced (1.7.5a)
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 10mm circle within zone 'A' (8.3.1a)
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 40mm circle outside zone 'A' (8.3.1d)
brake pedal anti-slip provision worn on edge
engine bay covers and under trays fitted
Front Headlamp deteriorated but light output not reduced both sides (1.7.5a)
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement rear bush (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front Side repeater slightly discoloured (1.4.A.2f)
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement rear bush (2.4.G.2)
Parking brake lever has little reserve travel (3.1.6b)
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 10mm circle within zone 'A' (8.3.1a)
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 40mm circle outside zone 'A' (8.3.1d)
brake pedal anti-slip provision worn on edge
covers in engine bay and under trays fitted
fuel tank retaining strap corroded
general exhaust corrosion
Brake pedal rubber worn.
Exhaust very rusty in places.
FRont brake pipes lightly corroded.
FRont tyre treads wewll worn.
Fuel tank straps rusty.
Headlamp aims and images just acceptable.
Little reserve travel on handbrake.
Rear underside area generally well worn.
headlamp patterns indistinct and aims on aim limits- just acceptable* shields on sills, underbody,etc,restrict examination* brake pedal rubber worn* sandon rear seats getting into seatbelt clasps- ok at timeof test*
osfseatbelt reluctant to retract* osftyreworn* exhaust heavily corroded*nsr tyre worn to limit* front vertical link bar gaiters heavily perished* front wishbone bushesworn* osr tyre worn andperished*
steering rack operation noisey andplay in both sides rack inner joints*
underbody andcomponents heavily corroded- also- frontsubframe,etc, petrol tank straps, rear subframe, platforms, anti rollbar, suspension mounting areas, brakehose ferrules,somebrake pipes,etc,etc.*
An item not tested (Manual)
Direction indicator incorrect colour (1.4.A.2f)
Exhaust has a major leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
Offside Headlamp aim beam image obviously incorrect (1.8.A.1b)
bonnet release very stiff and difficult to open* shieldson underbody restrict examination* nsf headlamp aim on aim limits* brake pedal rubber worn* sand on rear seats getting into seat belt clasps- ok at present time*
osf seatbelt reluctant to retract*osf tyre worn* exhaust heavily corroded* nsr tyre worn to limit due to tread design* front vertical link bar gaiters perished* front wishbone bushes worn* osr tyre worn and perished*
steering rack operation noisey and play in both sides steering rack inner joints*
underbody and components heavily corroded also; front subframe etc, petrol tank straps, rear suframe;platforms,anti roll bar,moumting areas,etc,exhaus, brake hoseferrules, somebrakepipes,etc,etc,.
some wear on brake pedal rubber, headlamp beam patterns and image just acceptable-moisture on inner lenses, under engine trayrestricts examination of components, rear petrol straps on tank rusting, nsr tyre well worn, exhaust very rusty in places.
headlamp patterns a little indistinct and on aim limits*slight play in osf inner rack jount* brake pedal rubber becoming worn* exhaust heavily corroded and weak in places* nsf tyre worn on edge*
little reserve travel on handbrake* rear subframe, suspension arms, anti-roll bar,etc, heavily corroded* front suspension components corroded*
exhaust very rusty in places, headlamp aism just within set limits and os beam image alittle indistinct, front brake pipes to both hoses beginning to corrode.
Nearside Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
Nearside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
exhaust very rusty in places, headlamp aism just within set limits and os beam image alittle indistinct, front brake pipes to both hoses beginning to corrode.
FRONT AND REAR BRAKE DISCS WORN - RECOMMEND REPLACEMENT*
heaadlamp patterns a little indistinct and on aim limits*
indicators losing orange effect* shields on outer sills, underbody, etc, restrict examination* rear subframe, suspension components,etc, heavily rusted* exhaust heavily rusted* very little reserve travel on handbrake- just ok*
exhaust very rusrt in places, front tyres well worn,headlamp aims just within set limits.
exhaust very rusty in places.
Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)
rear exhaust very rusty, rear disc faces corroded.
Nearside Front Windscreen wiper blade deteriorated (8.2.2)
Nearside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Stop lamp not working (1.2.1b)
Exhaust very rusty in places. OSR tyre well worn. Minor windscreen damage
How Reliable is the Rover 75?
Based on 1,365,354 MOT tests across 103,127 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
T255 DPR is a 1999 Rover 75 in Green with a 1,991cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 16 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 75%.
Across all 1999 Rover 75 models, the average MOT pass rate is 67.7% with a typical mileage of 88,731 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Rover 75 fails its MOT is brake pipe excessively corroded, accounting for 82,341 recorded failures. If you're considering buying T255 DPR, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Rover 75 typically stays on UK roads for around 27 years. At 27 years old, this Rover 75 is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of T255 DPR?
You can check the full history of T255 DPR by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was T255 DPR registered?
T255 DPR is a 1999 Rover 75, first registered on 8 July 1999.
Is T255 DPR safe to buy?
The MOT history for T255 DPR shows 16 tests with a 75% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does T255 DPR have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on T255 DPR. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.