MOT Status
ValidMileage
77,389 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Offside Front Seat belt webbing slightly damaged or frayed (7.1.2 (b))
Offside Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Wheel bearing rough when rotated (5.1.3 (b) (i))
Offside Front Seat belt webbing slightly damaged or frayed (7.1.2 (b))
Nearside Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength Inside of chassis leg (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Nearside Stop lamp(s) not working (4.3.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Brake master cylinder/servo mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (1.1.21 (e) (i))
Nearside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material feed to flexi hose (1.1.11 (c))
Nearside Front Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced footwell area corroded, plated to inside (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive rear diff (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Suspension arm ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated axle centre arm ball joint perished (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Spare tyre defective cracking and perished
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced general surface corrosion, underbody coating applied (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Wheel/tyre protruding beyond wheel arch all four
Nearside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Rear Oil leak, but not excessive diff (8.4.1 (a) (i))
full underbody/chassis protective coating applied
Nearside Front Headlamp aim too low (4.1.2 (a))
Offside Front Brake pipe excessively corroded (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Front Lower Coil spring insecure fixing to body misaligned (5.3.1 (a) (i))
Offside Front Upper Suspension spring mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength mounting panel (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Rear Oil leak, but not excessive diff (8.4.1 (a) (i))
full underbody/chassis protective coating applied
Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material both feed to flexi hoses (1.1.11 (c))
Rear Brake disc significantly and obviously worn both to inner face (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material both feed to flexi hoses (1.1.11 (c))
Front Integral body structure or chassis has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of a body mounting outriggers (6.2.2 (d) (i))
Headlamp aim too high both (4.1.2 (a))
Offside Front Anti-roll bar linkage pin or bush excessively worn loose (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength around anti roll bar mountings (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength crossmember within rear spring mountings (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Rear Vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced crossmember (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Exhaust silencer likely to become detached centre box rear joint (8.1.1 (b) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Nearside Rear Anti-roll bar attachment bracket/mounting likely to fail (5.3.3 (b) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Offside Rear Anti-roll bar attachment bracket/mounting fractured (5.3.3 (b) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Rear Brake disc worn, but not excessively both surface corroded (1.1.14 (a) (i))
steering damper leaking
underbody chassis sections undersealed prior to test
EXHAUST CENTRE SECTION JOINT CORRODED
Offside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened BOTH TO INNER FACE (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
complete underbody finished in protective waxoyl coating
Offside Front Vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Towbar excessively corroded within 30cm of towbar mounting CHASSIS LEGS (6.1.6 (i) (i))
Rear Vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced BOTH CHASSIS LEGS (6.1.1 (c) (i))
EXHAUST CENTRE SECTION JOINT CORRODED
Offside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened BOTH TO INNER FACE (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded top of outrigger (2.4.A.3)
Headlamp aim not tested engine cuts out with headlamps on (1.8.A.1c)
Nearside Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded outrigger (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Vehicle structure excessively corroded within 30cm of towbar mounting (6.6.6)
Offside Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded outrigger (2.4.A.3)
Offside Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded turret (2.4.A.3)
Offside Rear Direction indicator not working (1.4.A.2c)
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded anti roll bar (2.4.A.3)
Offside Vehicle structure excessively corroded within 30cm of towbar mounting (6.6.6)
Rear fog lamp missing (1.3.2a)
Service brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Stop lamp not working both (1.2.1b)
rear brake recording little or no effort both (3.7.B.5a)
rear bump stop missing
How Reliable is the Land Rover Defender?
Based on 2,960,045 MOT tests across 181,953 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
T761 NWL is a 1999 Land Rover Defender in Black with a 2,500cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 17 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 52.9%.
Across all 1999 Land Rover Defender models, the average MOT pass rate is 70.6% with a typical mileage of 106,873 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Land Rover Defender fails its MOT is shock absorber has an excessively worn bush, accounting for 77,499 recorded failures. If you're considering buying T761 NWL, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Land Rover Defender typically stays on UK roads for around 43 years. At 27 years old, this Land Rover Defender is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of T761 NWL?
You can check the full history of T761 NWL by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was T761 NWL registered?
T761 NWL is a 1999 Land Rover Defender, first registered on 30 June 1999.
Is T761 NWL safe to buy?
The MOT history for T761 NWL shows 17 tests with a 52.9% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does T761 NWL have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on T761 NWL. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.