MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
156,209 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front coil spring corroded both (2.4.C.1b)
Rear Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement large bushes on arms BORDERLINE (2.4.G.2)
corrosion to exhaust
corrosion to rear floor to sill edges and outer sills
corrosion to rear main chassis rails
n/s headlight discoloured and poor pattern
plastic oversills fitted
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Rear Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
coil spring corroded (2.4.C.1b)
corrosion to exhaust
corrosion to rear half of chassis
plastic oversills fitted
slight binding o/s/f wheel
welding repairs to vehicle
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Rear Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
coil spring corroded (2.4.C.1b)
cut to tread n/s/r tyre BORDERLINE
perishing and uneven wear rear tyres
plastic oversills fitted
poor pattern n/s headlight
slight binding o/s/f wheel
surface corrosion rear half of chassis
welding repairs to vehicle
coil spring corroded (2.4.C.1b)
corrosion to rear half of chassis
perishing rear tyres
poor pattern n/s headlight
splits to wiperblades BORDERLINE
welding repairs to sill panels
Nearside Front Upper Suspension arm has excessive play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
welding repairs to sill panels
splits to wiperblades BORDERLINE
coil spring corroded (2.4.C.1b)
corrosion to rear half of chassis
perishing rear tyres
poor pattern n/s headlight
dust gaiters on all front suspension joints perished/split
poor pattern to n/s headlight
small splits to wiperblades
surface corrosion to rear chassis rails
Anti-lock braking system warning lamp indicates an ABS fault (3.4.1c)
Centre Exhaust has a major leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
Exhaust tailpipe not capable of allowing the emission probe to be inserted (7.3.D.1)
Fuel cap/sealing device does not fasten securely by positive means (7.2.4b)
Nearside Rear Vehicle structure has excessive corrosion which adversely affects braking or steering (6.1.A.1)
Offside Front Anti-roll bar has excessive play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Upper Suspension arm has excessive play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear Vehicle structure has excessive corrosion which adversely affects braking or steering (6.1.A.1)
dust gaiters on all front suspension joints perished/split
poor pattern to n/s headlight
small splits to wiperblades
surface corrosion to rear chassis rails
Front Anti-roll bar rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Temporary fuel cap fitted
surface corrosion to rear chassis rails
Exhaust emissions carbon monoxide content after 2nd fast idle excessive (7.3.D.3)
Nearside Rear Shock absorber has a serious fluid leak (2.7.3)
Nearside Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
Rear Lower Trailing arm rubber bush deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Front Anti-roll bar rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Temporary fuel cap fitted
surface corrosion to rear chassis rails
Exhaust emissions carbon monoxide content after 2nd fast idle excessive (7.3.D.3)
Temporary fuel cap fitted
Nearside Rear Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (2.7.3)
Rear Lower Trailing arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Exhaust emissions Lambda reading after 2nd fast idle outside specified limits (7.3.D.3)
Exhaust emissions carbon monoxide content after 2nd fast idle excessive (7.3.D.3)
Centre Exhaust has part of the system slightly deteriorated (7.1.1a)
Nearside Rear Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (2.7.3)
Rear Lower Trailing arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Exhaust has part of the system slightly deteriorated (7.1.1a)
Offside Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Surface corrosion to both rear main chassis rails by fuel tank
Temp fuel cap type fitted
Offside Rear Tyre has a lump, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (4.1.D.1b)
Offside Rear Wheel nut(s) missing (4.2.A.1e)
Exhaust has part of the system slightly deteriorated (7.1.1a)
Nearside Headlamp aim too high (1.8)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Surface corrosion to both rear main chassis rails by fuel tank
Temp fuel cap type fitted
Exhaust has part of the system slightly deteriorated (7.1.1a)
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
High level brake light not working
Light perishing to both rear tyres
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
temporary fuel cap fitted
Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.5.1g)
Nearside Rear Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Rear Anti-roll bar linkage has excessive play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
spare tyre defective
temporary fuel cap fitted
How Reliable is the Honda Cr-v?
Based on 4,177,643 MOT tests across 304,403 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
T776 NAM is a 1999 Honda Cr-v in Green with a 1,973cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 19 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 63.2%.
Across all 1999 Honda Cr-v models, the average MOT pass rate is 68.9% with a typical mileage of 103,487 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Honda Cr-v fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 62,925 recorded failures. If you're considering buying T776 NAM, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Honda Cr-v typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 27 years old, this Honda Cr-v is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of T776 NAM?
You can check the full history of T776 NAM by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was T776 NAM registered?
T776 NAM is a 1999 Honda Cr-v, first registered on 11 March 1999.
Is T776 NAM safe to buy?
The MOT history for T776 NAM shows 19 tests with a 63.2% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does T776 NAM have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on T776 NAM. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.