MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
54,907 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrules both front. (3.6.B.4e)
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened discs are rusty. (3.5.1i)
Nearside Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded to flexy brake hose. (3.6.B.2c)
all four tyres outer walls are perishing/cracking.
complete exhaust system corroded.
complete underside of vehicle corroding.
Fuel Pipe/s corroded front to rear fuel pipe is heavily corroded. ()
Front position lamp(s) not working both front (1.1.A.3b)
Offside Front front brake binding (3.7.B.1)
Rear position lamp(s) not working both rear. (1.1.A.3b)
Registration plate lamp not working both rear. (1.1.C.1d)
Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrules both front. (3.6.B.4e)
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened discs are rusty. (3.5.1i)
Nearside Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded to flexy brake hose. (3.6.B.2c)
all four tyres outer walls are perishing/cracking.
complete exhaust system corroded.
complete underside of vehicle corroding.
Fuel Pipe/s corroded front to rear fuel pipe is heavily corroded. ()
Nearside Front Outer brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened disc surface rusty (3.5.1i)
front to rear fuel pipe is heavily corroded.
slight brake binding at offside front.
front to rear fuel pipe corroded
Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
Centre Body or chassis has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of the body mountings (6.1.B.2)
Horn not working (1.6.2a)
Nearside Front Shock absorber has a serious fluid leak (2.7.3)
Offside Front front brake binding (3.7.B.1)
Offside Rear Suspension has inadequate clearance with the bump stop (2.4.A.1a)
Front Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
front to rear fuel pipe corroded
Nearside Rear Brake hose slightly deteriorated (3.6.B.4d)
o/s rear brake binding slightly
rigid fuel line from tank to engine bay corroded
slight corrosion on all wheels around tyre valves
Nearside Front Sub-frame attachment bracket/mounting corroded and its strength is seriously reduced (2.4.G.1)
Nearside Headlamp aim too high and too far to the right. (1.8)
Offside Front Sub-frame attachment bracket/mounting corroded and its strength is seriously reduced (2.4.G.1)
Offside Headlamp insecure (1.7.3)
Centre Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
Nearside Headlamp not working on dipped beam (1.7.5a)
Nearside Headlamp not working on main beam (1.7.5a)
Offside Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (8.2.3)
Nearside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)
SURFACE CORROSION TO UNDERSIDE OF VEHICLE
Front Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (8.2.3)
Nearside Front brake disc excessively pitted (3.5.1h)
Nearside Rear Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
Offside Front brake disc excessively pitted (3.5.1h)
Offside Rear Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
Offside Rear Stop lamp not working (1.2.1b)
Steering column flexible coupling is excessively deteriorated (2.1.5)
How Reliable is the Peugeot 304?
Based on 1,700 MOT tests across 228 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
TNO 672N is a 1974 Peugeot 304 in Cream with a 1,288cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 14 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 57.1%.
Across all 1974 Peugeot 304 models, the average MOT pass rate is 69.1% with a typical mileage of 58,101 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Peugeot 304 fails its MOT is suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded, accounting for 111 recorded failures. If you're considering buying TNO 672N, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Peugeot 304 typically stays on UK roads for around 55 years. At 52 years old, this Peugeot 304 is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of TNO 672N?
You can check the full history of TNO 672N by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was TNO 672N registered?
TNO 672N is a 1974 Peugeot 304, first registered on 1 August 1974.
Is TNO 672N safe to buy?
The MOT history for TNO 672N shows 14 tests with a 57.1% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does TNO 672N have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on TNO 672N. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.