MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
2,370 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Driver's seat fore and aft adjustment mechanism not functioning as intended. (6.2.5 (b) (i))
Seat belt anchorage prescribed area strength or continuity significantly reduced central floor within 30 cm of seat belt buckles (7.1.1 (a) (i))
Stop lamp(s) adversely affected by the operation of another lamp both less bright than position lamps (4.3.3 (b))
Stop lamp(s) switch with a delay in operation only operate at maximum pedal input (4.3.2 (a) (ii))
Suspension component mounting prescribed area is inadequately repaired offside rear floor to sill (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Wheel bearing has excessive play offside & nearside front (5.1.3 (a) (i))
Steering column universal joint has slight wear or play (2.2.2 (c))
Offside Front Seat belt anchorage prescribed area strength or continuity significantly reduced floor area (7.1.1 (a) (i))
Windscreen washer not working (3.5 (a))
Nearside Headlamp aim too high (1.8)
Offside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Headlamp aim too high (1.8)
Nearside Front Direction indicator not working (1.4.A.2c)
Nearside Front position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
Nearside Rear Direction indicator not working (1.4.A.2c)
Offside Headlamp excessively deteriorated so that the light output is severely reduced (1.7.5a)
Offside Rear position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Rear Front position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
handbrake lever slightly loose on mounting
Nearside rear brake grabbing slightly (3.7.A.5b)
Offside Front Track rod end ball joint dust cover damaged, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.2.C.1c)
Offside rear brake grabbing slightly (3.7.A.5b)
n/s and o/s sills slight corrosion
underside of car covered in wax oil
slight bind on rear brakes
Offside Rear Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded (5.2.6)
Steering system has excessive free play detected at the steering wheel (steering rack fitted) (2.2.A.1b)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7) DANGEROUS
Parking brake: parking brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.7)
Suspension joint offside lower dust cover split/missing
offside handbrake lower efficiency
slight movement in steering rack mounting rubbers
slight unbalance front brakes lower nearside
underbody and floor areas corroding
Offside Front Suspension arm attachment bracket/mounting insecure (2.4.G.1)
Parking brake: parking brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.7)
Suspension joint offside lower dust cover split/missing
offside handbrake lower efficiency
slight movement in steering rack mounting rubbers
slight unbalance front brakes lower nearside
underbody and floor areas corroding
Nearside Front Shock absorber has a serious fluid leak (2.7.3)
Nearside Front Suspension arm has excessive play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Suspension arm has excessive play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Ball joint has slight play (2.2.B.1f)
Rear Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Centre Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
How Reliable is the Triumph 2000?
Based on 8,658 MOT tests across 1,036 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
UTD 868L is a 1972 Triumph 2000 in White with a 1,998cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 20 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 65%.
Across all 1972 Triumph 2000 models, the average MOT pass rate is 74.7% with a typical mileage of 55,544 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Triumph 2000 fails its MOT is suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded, accounting for 363 recorded failures. If you're considering buying UTD 868L, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Triumph 2000 typically stays on UK roads for around 77 years. At 54 years old, this Triumph 2000 is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of UTD 868L?
You can check the full history of UTD 868L by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was UTD 868L registered?
UTD 868L is a 1972 Triumph 2000, first registered on 28 November 1972.
Is UTD 868L safe to buy?
The MOT history for UTD 868L shows 20 tests with a 65% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does UTD 868L have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on UTD 868L. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.