MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
109,194 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Anti-lock braking system warning lamp indicates an ABS fault (1.6 (b))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material both front (1.1.11 (c))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Suspension arm ball joint has slight play both front lower (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge both front (5.2.3 (e))
both floors, chassis rails, under sills and outer sills slightly corroded
both rear wheel arches slightly corroded
Offside Front Brake hose slightly damaged (3.6.B.4d)
Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive both floors,sills,sill to floors,chassis rail,closing panel,flitches and axel (2.4.A.3)
Front constant velocity joint gaiter damaged to the extent that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc both (2.5.C.1a)
Nearside Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded front floor (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded under sill in several places (2.4.A.3)
Offside Front Brake hose slightly damaged (3.6.B.4d)
Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive both floors,sills,sill to floors,chassis rail,closing panel,flitches and axel (2.4.A.3)
both floors sill to floors undersills outer sills and inner flitches slightly corroded
both front top shocker mounts have slight play
nearside front bottom ball joint gaiter slightly perished
nearside front flexi brake hose slightly damaged
nearside front indicator slightly discloured
nearside rear metal brake pipe slightly corroded
offside front metal brake pipe slightly corroded
offside front outer cv gaiter slightly perished
Front Brake pipe slightly corroded to rear (3.6.B.2c)
Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive both floors , chassis rails, under sills and outer sills (2.4.A.3)
oil leak
Nearside Front Shock absorber has a serious fluid leak (2.7.3)
Nearside Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded centre floor (5.2.6)
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded closing panel (2.4.A.3)
Offside Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded front / centre floor (5.2.6)
Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded both rear outer sills (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Brake pipe slightly corroded front to rear metal (3.6.B.2c)
both floors, chassis rails, under sills and outer sills slightly corroded
oil leak
Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (2.4.A.3)
Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Shock absorber has a serious fluid leak (2.7.3)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Service brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear Brake pipe leaking (3.6.A.1) DANGEROUS
Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (2.4.A.3)
both front tyres on legal limit
Offside Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Parking brake lever has little reserve travel (3.1.6b)
both front, centre and rear floor to sills, floors and floors inside box sections slightly corroded
both rear axle bushes have slight play
exhaust heat sheilds insecure
offside rear outer sill has slight damage
Offside Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Anti-lock braking system warning lamp indicates an ABS fault (3.4.1c)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Front Brake hose excessively deteriorated (3.6.B.4d)
Nearside Rear Trailing arm has excessive play in a pin/bush (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Brake hose excessively deteriorated (3.6.B.4d)
Offside Rear Trailing arm has excessive play in a pin/bush (2.4.G.2)
Front brake flexis perishing slightly
Front discs worn
Rear metal brake pipes corroding slightly
Nearside Front Brake hose slightly deteriorated (3.6.B.4d)
Nearside Front Brake hose slightly deteriorated (3.6.B.4d)
Nearside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Nearside Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Upper Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
How Reliable is the Ford Puma?
Based on 713,333 MOT tests across 56,808 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
V359 HET is a 2000 Ford Puma in Black with a 1,679cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 20 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 70%.
Across all 2000 Ford Puma models, the average MOT pass rate is 67.3% with a typical mileage of 74,235 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Ford Puma fails its MOT is brake pipe excessively corroded, accounting for 62,649 recorded failures. If you're considering buying V359 HET, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Puma typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 26 years old, this Ford Puma is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of V359 HET?
You can check the full history of V359 HET by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was V359 HET registered?
V359 HET is a 2000 Ford Puma, first registered on 28 January 2000.
Is V359 HET safe to buy?
The MOT history for V359 HET shows 20 tests with a 70% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does V359 HET have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on V359 HET. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.