MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
132,698 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Anti-roll bar linkage pin or bush excessively worn left rear (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Anti-roll bar pin or bush excessively worn both rear (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Fuel pipe leaking (6.1.3 (b) (i))
Parking brake efficiency below requirements (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Parking brake inoperative on one side left rear (1.4.1 (a))
Seat belt anchorage prescribed area strength or continuity significantly reduced left central sill area (7.1.1 (a) (i))
Seat belt anchorage prescribed area strength or continuity significantly reduced left rear sill area (7.1.1 (a) (i))
Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength Left rear sill area (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength left rear antiroll bar D bush area (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Suspension spring mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength both sides at rear (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Right sill area (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Suspension arm damaged but not seriously weakened left rear (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge both rear (5.2.3 (e))
Prop shaft joint constant velocity boot no longer prevents the ingress of dirt left front outer (6.1.7 (g) (ii))
Suspension arm damaged but not seriously weakened left rear (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing both front (5.2.3 (d) (i))
Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge both front (5.2.3 (e))
Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge both rear (5.2.3 (e))
Tyre worn close to the legal limit left rear (4.1.E.1)
Subframe mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded left front (2.4.A.3)
Tyre worn close to the legal limit left rear (4.1.E.1)
Anti-roll bar linkage has excessive play in a ball joint Left front (2.4.G.2)
Subframe mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded Both side outer sills (2.4.A.3)
brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both rear (3.5.1i)
Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Power steering pipe(s) or hose(s) slightly corroded (2.3.2)
Power steering pipe(s) or hose(s) slightly corroded (2.3.2)
Anti-roll bar linkage fractured (2.4.G.1)
Front constant velocity joint gaiter deteriorated to the extent that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc (2.5.C.1a)
Nearside Front coil spring fractured (2.4.C.1a)
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Offside Front constant velocity joint gaiter split (2.5.C.1a)
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Front Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Offside Front Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Offside Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Front Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Nearside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Offside Front Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Offside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Front Side repeater not working (1.4.A.2c)
Offside Rear fog lamp not working (1.3.2b)
Offside Rear position lamp(s) excessively deteriorated so that it is not visible from a reasonable distance (1.1.A.3d)
How Reliable is the Ford Mondeo?
Based on 12,239,875 MOT tests across 1,205,291 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
V74 NUM is a 2000 Ford Mondeo in Blue with a 2,544cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 22 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 59.1%.
Across all 2000 Ford Mondeo models, the average MOT pass rate is 64.7% with a typical mileage of 90,872 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Ford Mondeo fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 610,562 recorded failures. If you're considering buying V74 NUM, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Mondeo typically stays on UK roads for around 33 years. At 26 years old, this Ford Mondeo is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of V74 NUM?
You can check the full history of V74 NUM by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was V74 NUM registered?
V74 NUM is a 2000 Ford Mondeo, first registered on 1 February 2000.
Is V74 NUM safe to buy?
The MOT history for V74 NUM shows 22 tests with a 59.1% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does V74 NUM have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on V74 NUM. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.