MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
125,612 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Exhaust emissions carbon monoxide content at idle excessive (7.3.D.4)
Nearside Front Outer Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords (4.1.D.1a)
Nearside Inner Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded sill (5.2.6)
Nearside Rear Tyre(s) incorrect because different size tyres are fitted on the same axle. (4.1.A.1a)
Offside Headlamp incorrect colour (1.7.5b)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
rear parking brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.6a)
Front Macpherson strut has slight movement at the upper attachment n/s & o/s (2.5.A.1c)
both rear coil springs heavily corroded
both sides front lower suspension arm rubber bushes deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement
damage to vehicle
engine misfiring
front and rear brake hoses heavily deteriorated - recommend replacement now
front brake discs heavily worn - recommend replacement
front registration plate damaged
front to rear brake pipes corroded
heavy corrosion to chassis, suspension components and rear cross member area rotten through but not near prescribed areas
o/s/f tyre worn close to legal limit - inner edge wearing heavy
oil around engine
parking brake cables insecure
spare wheel carrier excessively corroded
under vehicle heavily under sealed and previously welded
windscreen chipped
Engine oil leaks
Front Brake hose slightly deteriorated Both (3.6.B.4d)
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened Both (3.5.1i)
Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Park brake close to limit
Rear coil spring corroded Both (2.4.C.1b)
Sills repaired and covered in wax
Underfloor and chassis rusty
Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.5.1g)
Nearside Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded closing sill (5.2.6)
Nearside Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded outersill (5.2.6)
Nearside Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded closing sill (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded outersill (2.4.A.3)
Offside Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded closing sill (5.2.6)
Offside Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded outersill (5.2.6)
Offside Side repeater missing (1.4.A.2b)
Offside Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded closing sill (2.4.A.3)
Offside Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded outersill (2.4.A.3)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
chassis and floor pans corroded heavily
front brake discs corroded and badly worn
fuel around tank, suspect leaking but not at time of test
fuel pipes corroded heavily
lift in offside and nearside front top suspension mountings just acceptable
offside and nearside front brake flexi hoses perished and need replacement
oil around engine
rear coil springs corroded
trims fitted to rear inner wheel arches
Both rear tyres starting to perrish & crack.
Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Oil leak
Nearside Outer Front constant velocity joint gaiter deteriorated to the extent that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc (2.5.C.1a)
Offside Front coil spring broken (2.4.C.1a)
Offside Headlamp aim beam image obviously incorrect (1.8.A.1b)
Offside Inner Front constant velocity joint gaiter insecure to the extent that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc (2.5.C.1a)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Both rear tyres starting to perrish & crack.
Front Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.5b)
Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Oil leak
Nearside Headlamp aim too high (1.8)
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 40mm circle outside zone 'A' (8.3.1d)
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 40mm circle outside zone 'A' (8.3.1d)
Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Rear Macpherson strut has slight movement at the upper attachment (2.5.A.1c)
Nearside front brake juddering slightly (3.7.A.2b)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Macpherson strut has slight movement at the upper attachment (2.5.A.1c)
Offside front brake juddering slightly (3.7.A.2b)
rear wheel arches deteriorating
coil springs corroded/ front discs poor/ fuel pipes corroded/ oil leaks
fuel pipes rusty,coil springs & strut top poor...
front & rear coil springs corroded/ exhaust rusty/ flexy brake pipes ends corroded/ engine /gearbox oil leaks/ fuel pipes corroded/ n/s/f lower arm bushes cplitting/
Offside Front Suspension arm synthetic bush deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear position lamp(s) excessively deteriorated so that it is not visible from a reasonable distance (1.1.A.3d)
front & rear coil springs corroded/ exhaust rusty/ flexy brake pipes ends corroded/ engine /gearbox oil leaks/ fuel pipes corroded/ n/s/f lower arm bushes cplitting/
Offside Front Front position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
Exhaust has part of the system slightly deteriorated (7.1.1a)
travel on hand brake
How Reliable is the Ford Puma?
Based on 713,333 MOT tests across 56,808 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
V804 NWC is a 2000 Ford Puma in Green with a 1,679cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 18 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 66.7%.
Across all 2000 Ford Puma models, the average MOT pass rate is 67.3% with a typical mileage of 74,235 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Ford Puma fails its MOT is brake pipe excessively corroded, accounting for 62,649 recorded failures. If you're considering buying V804 NWC, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Puma typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 26 years old, this Ford Puma is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of V804 NWC?
You can check the full history of V804 NWC by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was V804 NWC registered?
V804 NWC is a 2000 Ford Puma, first registered on 3 February 2000.
Is V804 NWC safe to buy?
The MOT history for V804 NWC shows 18 tests with a 66.7% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does V804 NWC have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on V804 NWC. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.