MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
77,049 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
front brake pads getting low
front brake pipes heavily corroded
front disc corroded
front wishbone bushes unbonding
offside and nearside rear axle bushes unbonding and spliting very near excessive
play in offside front ball joint
reae inner sills heavily corroded
rear brake pipes corroded
rear handbrake effort slightly low
rear outer sills heavily corroded
rear suspension parts corroded
slight plat in role bar links
Both front brake pipes corroding.front disc pads worn
Nearside Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded Sill (5.2.6)
Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded Both I inner sills at rear (2.4.A.3)
Both front brake pipes corroding.front disc pads worn
Nearside Front Brake hose excessively deteriorated (3.6.B.4d)
Nearside Front constant velocity joint gaiter damaged to the extent that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc (2.5.C.1a)
Offside Front Brake hose excessively deteriorated (3.6.B.4d)
Offside Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
Offside Subframe mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Child seat fitted not allowing full inspection of adult belt
Nearside Front Sub-frame rubber bush deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Nearside rear parking brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.6a)
Offside Front Front constant velocity joint gaiter damaged to the extent that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc (2.5.C.1a)
Offside Front Sub-frame rubber bush deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Child seat fitted not allowing full inspection of adult belt
offside and nearside front wishbone bushes starting to unbond and split
offside and nearside rear axle bushes starting to split and unbond
offside and nearside rear brake pipes very heavily corroded
offside and nearside rear coil springs very heavily corroded
offside and nearside rear inner sills very heavily corroded
offside front coil spring very heavily corroded
slight blow on exhaust
Nearside Front Headlamp aim too low (1.8)
Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
slight blow on exhaust
offside and nearside front wishbone bushes starting to unbond and split
offside and nearside rear axle bushes starting to split and unbond
offside and nearside rear brake pipes very heavily corroded
offside and nearside rear coil springs very heavily corroded
offside and nearside rear inner sills very heavily corroded
offside front coil spring very heavily corroded
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
offside and nearside rear axle bushes starting to split and unbond
offside front tyre on limit
offside and nearside rear axle bushes starting to split and unbond
offside front tyre on limit
offside and nearside rear brake pipes very heavily corroded
slight oil leak around gearbox area
How Reliable is the Ford Puma?
Based on 713,333 MOT tests across 56,808 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
V858 LNO is a 2000 Ford Puma in Silver with a 1,388cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 16 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 68.8%.
Across all 2000 Ford Puma models, the average MOT pass rate is 67.3% with a typical mileage of 74,235 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Ford Puma fails its MOT is brake pipe excessively corroded, accounting for 62,649 recorded failures. If you're considering buying V858 LNO, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Puma typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 26 years old, this Ford Puma is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of V858 LNO?
You can check the full history of V858 LNO by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was V858 LNO registered?
V858 LNO is a 2000 Ford Puma, first registered on 28 January 2000.
Is V858 LNO safe to buy?
The MOT history for V858 LNO shows 16 tests with a 68.8% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does V858 LNO have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on V858 LNO. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.