MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
102,514 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Front Lower Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover damaged, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Rear Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (2.7.3)
Offside Front Lower Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover damaged, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
corrosion to both front coil springs
damage to offside front wing and door
engine oil sump damaged
movement in both front suspension top mountings
nearside front wheel arch trim missing
nearside rear tyre perrished
offside rear tyre badly perrished
play in both front shock absorber legs
Offside Headlamp aim beam image obviously incorrect (1.8.A.1b)
Brakes imbalanced across an axle (3.7.B.5b)
Electrical wiring damaged and bare wires exposed (1.9.2c)
Electrical wiring insecure (1.9.2a)
Emissions not tested (7.0)
Exhaust catalytic converter missing where one was fitted as standard (7.1.3)
Nearside Electrical wiring damaged and bare wires exposed (1.9.2c)
Nearside Electrical wiring insecure (1.9.2a)
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm locating pin locking device missing (2.4.G.3b)
Nearside Front position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
Nearside Headlamp aim beam image obviously incorrect (1.8.A.1b)
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Offside Electrical wiring deteriorated and bare wires exposed (1.9.2c)
Offside Electrical wiring insecure (1.9.2a)
Offside Front Electrical wiring deteriorated and bare wires exposed (1.9.2c)
Offside Front Electrical wiring insecure (1.9.2a)
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm locating pin locking device missing (2.4.G.3b)
Offside Front position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Power steering inoperative (2.3.3a)
Coolant leak
Nearside Front Lower Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover damaged, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Rear Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (2.7.3)
Offside Front Lower Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover damaged, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
corrosion to both front coil springs
damage to offside front wing and door
engine oil sump damaged
movement in both front suspension top mountings
nearside front wheel arch trim missing
nearside rear tyre perrished
offside rear tyre badly perrished
oil filter damaged
play in both front shock absorber legs
aux bels cracking
chips in screen
exhaust corroding
n/s/f anti roll bar and lower ball joint dust covers have pin holes
n/s/r tyre close to wear bars
rear number plate cracked
spare wheel and hanger missing
various marks to body and alloys
various pipes corroding
various suspention and chassis componants corroding
Offside Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (2.4.A.3)
Offside Outer Front constant velocity joint gaiter deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.5.C.1a)
sill covers fitted
underside of the vehicle is showing surface rust
Exhaust noisy (7.1.4)
Nearside Rear Road wheel slightly damaged (4.2.A.1a)
Oil leak
non standard rear exhaust fitted
Exhaust emissions carbon monoxide content after 2nd fast idle excessive (7.3.D.3)
Nearside Front constant velocity joint gaiter split (2.5.C.1a)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Front brake disc excessively pitted (3.5.1h)
Offside Front brake disc excessively pitted (3.5.1h)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
How Reliable is the Peugeot 106?
Based on 2,880,076 MOT tests across 319,421 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
W161 JAE is a 2000 Peugeot 106 in Silver with a 1,360cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 12 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 75%.
Across all 2000 Peugeot 106 models, the average MOT pass rate is 66.8% with a typical mileage of 66,731 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Peugeot 106 fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 155,158 recorded failures. If you're considering buying W161 JAE, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Peugeot 106 typically stays on UK roads for around 34 years. At 26 years old, this Peugeot 106 is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of W161 JAE?
You can check the full history of W161 JAE by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was W161 JAE registered?
W161 JAE is a 2000 Peugeot 106, first registered on 3 March 2000.
Is W161 JAE safe to buy?
The MOT history for W161 JAE shows 12 tests with a 75% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does W161 JAE have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on W161 JAE. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.