MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
146,779 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread damaged (6.3.1d)
Nearside Front Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive door sill (5.2.6)
Nearside Rear Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrules (3.6.B.4e)
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive wheel arch (2.4.A.3)
Offside Front Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive door sill (5.2.6)
Offside Outer Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive sill has rust patches (5.2.6)
Offside Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded front to rear,at rear by tank (3.6.B.2c)
Offside Rear Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive door sill (5.2.6)
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive wheel arch (2.4.A.3)
Oil leak engine ()
both front wheel arches rusty
Nearside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin on 2mm (3.5.1g)
Central Stop lamp has less than 50% of the light sources illuminating (1.2.1b)
Front registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread damaged (6.3.1d)
Nearside Front Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive door sill (5.2.6)
Nearside Rear Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrules (3.6.B.4e)
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive wheel arch (2.4.A.3)
Offside Front Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive door sill (5.2.6)
Offside Outer Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive sill has rust patches (5.2.6)
Offside Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded front to rear,at rear by tank (3.6.B.2c)
Offside Rear Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive door sill (5.2.6)
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive wheel arch (2.4.A.3)
Oil leak engine ()
both front wheel arches rusty
Nearside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin on 2mm (3.5.1g)
Nearside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Nearside Front brake slightly binding
Offside Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive outer sill (5.2.6)
oil leaK
Nearside Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded front - rear outer sill (5.2.6)
Nearside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Nearside Front brake slightly binding
Offside Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive outer sill (5.2.6)
oil leaK
both outer sills corroded front - rear
both rear wheel arches slightly corroded
nearside front wheel binding on
Brakes imbalanced across an axle (3.7.B.5b)
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
rear brake application uneven (3.7.B.2)
both outer sills corroded front - rear
both rear wheel arches slightly corroded
nearside front wheel binding on
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
o/s wiper blade split
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded (5.2.6)
Offside Rear position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
Offside Side repeater incorrect colour (1.4.A.2f)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Parking brake: parking brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.7)
o/s wiper blade split
Nearside Front Lower Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded (5.2.6)
Nearside Stop lamp not working (1.2.1b)
Rear registration plate faded but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Nearside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Offside Front Front constant velocity joint gaiter damaged to the extent that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc (2.5.C.1a)
Offside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Rear registration plate faded but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Nearside Registration plate lamp not illuminating the registration plate (1.1.C.1e)
Offside Front constant velocity joint gaiter deteriorated (2.5.C.1a)
Offside Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
Offside Front constant velocity joint gaiter deteriorated (2.5.C.1a)
Battery insecure
n/s front wiper blade slightly split but still can clear the screen
Nearside Front suspension has excessive play in a lower suspension ball joint (2.5.B.1a)
Nearside Rear position lamp(s) excessively deteriorated so that it is not visible from a reasonable distance (1.1.A.3d)
Battery insecure
n/s front wiper blade slightly split but still can clear the screen
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Front constant velocity joint gaiter split (2.5.C.1a)
Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front suspension has excessive play in a lower suspension ball joint (2.5.B.1a)
How Reliable is the Rover 25?
Based on 1,784,341 MOT tests across 157,261 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
W241 CTW is a 2000 Rover 25 in Red with a 1,994cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 21 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 57.1%.
Across all 2000 Rover 25 models, the average MOT pass rate is 70.0% with a typical mileage of 62,411 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Rover 25 fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 69,670 recorded failures. If you're considering buying W241 CTW, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Rover 25 typically stays on UK roads for around 26 years. At 26 years old, this Rover 25 is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of W241 CTW?
You can check the full history of W241 CTW by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was W241 CTW registered?
W241 CTW is a 2000 Rover 25, first registered on 25 April 2000.
Is W241 CTW safe to buy?
The MOT history for W241 CTW shows 21 tests with a 57.1% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does W241 CTW have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on W241 CTW. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.