MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
58,260 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Front Suspension arm ball joint has slight play Upper Ball Joint Very Slight Play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush (5.3.2 (c))
Oil leak, but not excessive Engine (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Both Rear Lower Main Arms Outer Bushes (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Track rod end ball joint has slight play Both Sides Very Slight Play (2.1.3 (b) (i))
Service brake efficiency below requirements (1.2.2 (a) (i))
Suspension rod pin or bush excessively worn Both Rear Trailing Rods/Lower Suspension Arms Bushes (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Suspension arm ball joint has slight play Upper Ball Joint Very Slight Play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush (5.3.2 (c))
Offside Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources and Nearside Reduced Light Output (4.7.1 (b) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive Engine (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Track rod end ball joint has slight play Both Sides Very Slight Play (2.1.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Upper Suspension arm ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive Engine (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Suspension rod ball joint has slight play Both Rear, Rear Tie/Tracking Rods Outer Ball Joints (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Suspension rod pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Both Rear Tie Rods/Lower Suspension Arms Bushes (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Tyre has a bulge, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure Bulging Circumference of Inner Sidewall (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Nearside Rear Upper Suspension arm ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive Engine (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Suspension rod ball joint has slight play Both Rear, Rear Tie/Tracking Rods Outer Ball Joints (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Suspension rod pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Both Rear Tie Rods/Lower Suspension Arms Bushes (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened Both Fronts Inner Surfaces (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened Both Rears Corroded (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Brake pad(s) wearing thin Both Fronts Inners (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Brake pad(s) wearing thin Both Rears Inners Near Metal Wear Indicators (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Direction indicator slightly discoloured Both Fronts (4.4.3 (a))
Nearside Rear Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Tie Rod and Outer Bush Both Worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Direction indicator slightly discoloured (4.4.3 (a))
Offside Rear Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Tie Rod and Outer Bush Both Worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive Engine Slight Oil Leak (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Windscreen Stone Chipped
Parking brake efficiency below requirements (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
Coolant leak rear of engine (heater hose joint) very sight seepage ()
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Horn not working (1.6.2a)
Offside Front Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (2.7.3)
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Headlamp aim too low (1.8)
Offside Front Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (2.7.3)
Offside Headlamp aim too low (1.8)
headlamp aims on limit.
How Reliable is the MG Mgf?
Based on 546,238 MOT tests across 40,565 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
W252 WGS is a 2000 MG Mgf in Blue with a 1,796cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 21 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 76.2%.
Across all 2000 MG Mgf models, the average MOT pass rate is 68.1% with a typical mileage of 56,343 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a MG Mgf fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 37,610 recorded failures. If you're considering buying W252 WGS, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The MG Mgf typically stays on UK roads for around 31 years. At 26 years old, this MG Mgf is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of W252 WGS?
You can check the full history of W252 WGS by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was W252 WGS registered?
W252 WGS is a 2000 MG Mgf, first registered on 24 March 2000.
Is W252 WGS safe to buy?
The MOT history for W252 WGS shows 21 tests with a 76.2% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does W252 WGS have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on W252 WGS. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.